Expert Speak Raisina Debates
Published on Feb 29, 2020
Seen from UK, Kashmir fits the global roster of causes for Jihadists elements

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">Over a month has now passed since the Indian government made the dramatic step of changing Kashmir’s constitutional role and while the move has stirred emotions, we have not seen the outburst of violence that was expected. While it is difficult to know exactly what is going on in Kashmir and there are deep humanitarian concerns, sat in London the concern that is always present is how this might echo back into the UK. The UK has a sad history of links to violence in Kashmir, from the murder of Ravinda Mhatre in 1984 through to the London Bridge attacker from December last year. In between we have had radicalised Brits blowing themselves up in Srinagar, involved in terrorist linked kidnappings, as well as others arrested as they try to cross the line of control. The UK has a more intimate connection than others to what happens in Kashmir, meaning an eruption of violence or instability there is something that is watched with a very attentive eye.

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">The history of the UK’s link to Kashmir is a long and sad one. Born in part out of a dam construction in Mangala in the 1960s, this led to the displacement of a large population from the Pakistani part of Kashmir who migrated to the UK. This created a community which over time became the first link in a chain migration which left the UK in a situation whereby roughly three quarters of its Muslim population of around 3 million is of Kashmiri origin.

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">While the positive side of this connection has been to enrich the United Kingdom with a dynamic community that has contributed positively to the country, the negative side has been to inextricably link the United Kingdom to the persistent troubles that take place in Kashmir. This has over the years articulated itself in large-scale protests in the UK, the murder of Indian diplomats, fundraising for Kashmiri causes (mostly charitable, but also terrorist organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba or Jaish-e-Mohammed), as well created a path to militancy which led to terrorist attacks in Kashmir and which al Qaeda took advantage of to launch a number of failed and successful terrorist attacks against the West. 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">The most recent articulation of this was found in the case of Usman Khan, the troubled young man who lashed out against those who were helping rehabilitate him. Of Pakistani heritage, but born in the UK, Khan was arrested in 2010 as part of a terrorist cell whose most mature plot was a plan to attack the London Stock Exchange on Christmas Day. The group was one with deep links into the UK’s jihadist milieu with links around the country. Ultimately, they were prosecuted for a variety of acts, with the LSE plot the one which attracted most attention.

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">In fact, one of the more concerning elements was the part of the plot to which Khan was linked. Drawing on his Kashmiri family and heritage, Khan’s intent (along with a group of his colleagues from Stoke) was to try to establish a terrorist training camp in Pakistan. The intent was to establish an institution that would outwardly appear “a normal madrassa” but which would train warriors. Their goal, as was later summarized in court, was “the express contemplation of terrorist operations in the UK to be perpetrated by some graduates of the training camp at some future date: the imposition of Sharia in Kashmir was not the limit of the group's aspirations.” Khan’s own lawyer characterized him as a 19 year old young man “whose ambition was to bring Sharia law to Pakistan controlled Kashmir”, though he also made on to make the point about how fanciful this planning was pointing out that “it was highlight unrealistic to suppose that the authorities in Pakistan would allow a teenager from Stoke to impose Sharia law.”

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">This lack of credibility aside, the fact remained that for Khan, Kashmir was a mobilizing cause. The space for militancy that it provided gave the young man a place and way into being involved in violent jihadist activity. He was in many ways tracing a path that had been seen repeatedly before in the United Kingdom, where young British men of South Asian heritage were stirred up by a combination of local preachers and global events to reach into their Kashmiri heritage to try to find links to militancy. This was seen in the early story of the network around the July 7, 2005 bombing plot against London as well as numerous others.

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">The connection has stretched beyond terrorist violence. In the wake of the recent decision in Jammu & Kashmir, there have been numerous protests in London and Birmingham, including some that have turned violent. While the protests have not been of a scale that has been seen previously, they come from a history of such incidents in the wake of any major event in J&K. For Britain’s Kashmiri community, watching from afar what is happening to their brethren in India is a source of great concern. It leads to calls for action in Parliament, pressure on the government and regular protests. 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">But this political activity in some ways is not the problem. There are numerous expatriate communities in the UK who regularly protest about events going on back home. What is more worrying is the link that we have seen occasionally emerge with links to militancy. And while care has to be taken to make a direct correlation (mobilization for Kashmiri causes does not always equate to international terrorism), there is a long history of Kashmir providing ideological motivation or a practical first step for people to become involved in international terrorism. Prime Minister Modi’s moves and elevation has been a source of great concern and source of mobilization amongst the South Asian jihadist community in the UK. There is an inevitable link between turmoil in Kashmir and trouble in the UK. The timeline along which this can take place can be long, but the consistent feature is that these things resonate. 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">And seen from Kashmir, anger against Delhi is something which gets articulated through an international lens. While the stories of ISIS in Kashmir appear to be largely overblown, graffiti in Srinagar identified in ORF’s own Kabir Taneja’s recent book on ISIS shows how locals articulate their anger using the language of ISIS even if they have little direct connection to the group itself. The point is that Kashmir fits into the global roster of causes which jihadists will summon as rationales for action. For the UK, however, the link is more immediate.

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black"> 

< lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 13.5pt;font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif;color: black">Seen from London, the Modi government’s decision is a human rights dilemma which is wrapped up in a potential security threat (both regionally and at home). The consequences may take months or years to play out, but there can be no doubt that some impact will eventually be felt.


The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Author

Raffaello Pantucci

Raffaello Pantucci

Read More +

Contributor

Raffaello Pantucci

Raffaello Pantucci

Raffaello Pantucci is Senior Visiting Fellow at the S. Rajarantam School of International Studies (RSIS) and Senior Associate Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute ...

Read More +