Expert Speak Raisina Debates
Published on Jul 17, 2023
Getting the neighbourhood act together The trajectory of regional cooperation among South Asian nations in supporting one another at the international fora, has been heartening and holds a lot of promise for the future Unknown to many and unacknowledged by the rest, India’s neighbourhood is churning in ways that could contribute to a coordinated, if not cooperative, foreign and security policy for the region as a whole. It may not happen any time soon, but when it happens, it could take the shape of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the European Union (EU), in different ways and different measures—possibly excluding Pakistan and Afghanistan, two of the eight South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) members. Already, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Mauritius are members of the ‘Colombo Security Conclave’ (CSC), floated in 2020, with Bangladesh and the Seychelles as ‘Observers’. Their aim is to “jointly combat the increasing threats related to maritime safety, terrorism, trafficking, and organised crime affecting the partner nations”. At present, the Ocean neighbours are focusing on non-traditional security areas like the environment and also new-generation concerns like cyber security, with expectations to graduate to full-fledged security and defence cooperation at a much later date. Before the creation of the CSC, India had restructured its thinking on the southern neighbourhood and also reorganised its official mechanisms for the purpose. India, thus, created a new Indian Ocean Region (IOR) Division in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), to deal with its immediate neighbours in the Indian Ocean Region, starting with Maldives, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, and the Seychelles. In 2019, it expanded the Division to include Madagascar, Comoros, and French Réunion Island, forming an outer periphery of the nearer IOR.
The Ocean neighbours are focusing on non-traditional security areas like the environment and also new-generation concerns like cyber security, with expectations to graduate to full-fledged security and defence cooperation at a much later date.
For now, nations like Sri Lanka have been careful not to be branded as being on any side of the global or regional geostrategic side with the United States (US) and India coming closer with each passing year, and China getting distanced from them, on the other. Recently, Foreign Minister Ali Sabry reiterated Sri Lanka’s official position that they would ‘stay neutral in China-India rivalry’. However, nations like India will have to see Sri Lanka, for instance, accepting regional guarantees and mutual support in areas of traditional security concerns as a step to move away from the increasing 'dragon embrace' of China, whose debt trap has become an acronym of sorts for 'strategic subordination' without being seemingly so.  That is not expected to happen any time soon, at least until after the nation has sorted out its external debt restructuring and had begun to make it work on the ground.

‘Neighbourhood First’ and more

This time around, it is in matters of foreign policy that neighbours are backing India or seeking India’s help to sort out issues with third nations, thus, conferring greater relevance and import on New Delhi’s ‘Neighbourhood First’ policy and making it a common slogan for all regional nations. This goes beyond what has by now become customary for India to stand by Sri Lanka on allegations of human rights violations and war crimes probe at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). Barring early instances, way back in 2012 and 2013, when India voted for the US-led resolution seeking ‘independent investigations’, but only after getting the draft resolution diluted in Sri Lanka’s favour, New Delhi has always abstained from voting, since, to record its sympathy for the southern neighbour that had eliminated the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) terror-group as no other country elsewhere had done, but at the same time acknowledging that Colombo needed to do more for ‘ethnic reconciliation’, which it had promised even before the nation became a ‘UNHRC case’.
Maldives Parliament Speaker Mohammed Nasheed stood by India at a SAARC Speakers’ conference in Malé, when Qasim Suri, Deputy Speaker of Pakistan's National Assembly Qasim Suri sought to raise the ‘Kashmir issue’.
It is in this background, Sri Lanka, possibly for the first time in regional affairs, has openly backed India’s allegations against Canada that the latter was driven by ‘vote-bank politics’ in controlling the activities of ‘pro-Khalistani groups’. In a tweet supporting the concerns expressed by his Indian counterpart, S Jaishankar, Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister Ali Sabry said that no country could afford to grant sanctuaries to terrorists and secessionists after ‘Khalistani extremists’ publicly glorified the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi (in October 1980). On issues within the region, Maldives Parliament Speaker Mohammed Nasheed stood by India at a SAARC Speakers’ conference in Malé, when Qasim Suri, Deputy Speaker of Pakistan's National Assembly Qasim Suri sought to raise the ‘Kashmir issue’. When Indian delegation leader, Havinash Narayan Singh, Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, protested loudly and clearly, Nasheed as the host-chair ruled that Kashmir was not on the agreed agenda of the conference. Maldives, as he added, had always held Kashmir to be an ‘internal issue’ of India since its independence in 1947. Significantly, the nation has not even considered it to be a bilateral matter between the two neighbours, though that has been New Delhi’s stance vis-á-vis third nations and their prospects of intervention. Incidentally, from within Maldives, incumbent President Mohamed Solih promulgated a law to ban the ‘India Out’ campaign of the Opposition PPM-PNC combine, initiated by jailed former President Abdulla Yameen. In doing so, Solih described the protests as a ‘threat to national and regional security’. The Maldivian High Court has now taken up a petition challenging the presidential order, for hearing.

Interceding for Bangladesh

A lesser-known development in India’s neighbourhood policy is the expectation others have from New Delhi to intercede with global powers on their behalf. Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to Washington, DC, where he met with President Joe Biden, among other engagements, Bangladesh reportedly urged India to help ‘tide over a rough patch in ties with the US’.
The US issued a ban on American visas for those Bangladesh nationals that are ‘interfering in the democratic process’ of that nation.
According to reports, Dhaka sought India’s assistance, especially over American reservations on upcoming general elections in that country. This reportedly followed the US Ambassador Peter Haas’s repeated calls for ensuring a free and transparent general election and his meeting with the chief election commissioner to discuss the matter, personally. Following this, the US issued a ban on American visas for those Bangladesh nationals that are ‘interfering in the democratic process’ of that nation. In this background, reports spoke about Bangladesh Foreign Minister A K Abdul Momen discussing the matter with EAM Jaishankar on the sidelines of the G-20 development ministers’ meeting in Varanasi on 12 June. It is, however, not known if this figured in the India-America summit-level talks—but then the trajectory of regional cooperation among South Asian nations in supporting one another at the international fora, including in UNHRC rulings, has been heartening and holds a lot of promise for the future.
N. Sathiya Moorthy is a policy analyst and commentator, based in Chennai.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Contributor

N. Sathiya Moorthy

N. Sathiya Moorthy

N. Sathiya Moorthy is a policy analyst and commentator based in Chennai.

Read More +