Originally Published 2018-06-25 10:15:09 Published on Jun 25, 2018
Maldives: The problem is Yameen, not the visas
For the last few weeks, Maldives President Abdulla Yameen has been sending some tough messages to Delhi. Firstly, his government refused to extend the visas of our helicopter pilots based in Gaan island of Addu atoll. Secondly, he asked the Government of India to remove the helicopters by the end of this month (June 2018). Then the final blow; all Indians working in the Maldives have been told to get out with clear instructions that their work permits would not be extended. All private employers, resort/hotel owners have been told not to employ Indians since no work permits would be issued to them. Well, India denied visa to one ruling party MP Ahmed Nihan Hussain Maniku, in the first week of June, who landed in Chennai on the expectation of getting a routine visa on arrival (which is the practice between the two neighbors), but was denied entry. Now is the Maldivian government retaliating for this? Perhaps not. It’s more likely that India was reacting to the rejection of work permits to its pilots, who were on Official passports. So, is it just a tit for tat? No, the bad blood goes back much earlier and is far more fundamental in the nature we govern ourselves. And that’s where the itch is. The downturn in our relations began almost three years ago, when President Yameen started treating his opposition leaders as criminals and putting them behind bars with the help of an extremely malleable judiciary. But the worsening of our relations truly began after the events of 1st February 2018, when the Supreme Court ordered the release of all political prisoners including former President and leader of the main opposition party, the Maldivian Democratic Party, Mohamed Nasheed; Jumhoree party leader Gasim Ibrahim, Aadalath party leader Sheikh Imran Abdulla and 6 other MPs stating that their trials violated the Maldives Constitution and International Law. More recently, he got several MPs arrested and jailed them when they tried to attend the Parliament to discuss a No-Confidence motion against the President. But the cruelest cut of all was the imprisonment of former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, an 80 year old patriarch who was head of the united opposition group, and the arrest of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who declared that the imprisonment of Mohd. Nasheed and 9 other MPs was illegal. While President Yameen was crushing the opposition parties, the Parliament and the Supreme Court, the government of India did precious little, despite repeated calls by the leaders of Maldivian Democratic Party for India to intervene on the side of democracy. Instead, Delhi reportedly assured China (Indian Express, 28th March) that it would not intervene in the affairs of Maldives and expected similar ‘strategic trust’ that the latter would ‘not cross the lines of legitimacy’. If this is true, then it’s a strange way of exercising foreign policy in our own backyard. It is not clear as to who gave such an assurance and what were the terms of that assurance. Did we assure China that we would not interfere as long as Yameen is giving away military bases to China, or did we also say that we would not intervene even if he throws out all the Indians working in that country? At what point was this assurance going to be ‘time-barred’ or un-bankable? When China is invited by the duly elected government of the Maldives to set-up military bases in its northern atolls, obviously it is not crossing any lines of legitimacy. And who decides the ‘lines of legitimacy’ – obviously the host country and not us. Yameen is merely consolidating his country’s strategic partnership with China and is asking us to remove the two helicopters from the strategic Gaan island in the southernmost Addu atoll. Do we quietly accept his decision because of our commitment to China? Is this in line with our newly emergent status as an Indo-pacific power? If we cannot protect our interests in the Indian Ocean then there is hardly any chance of us asserting ourselves in the Pacific Ocean. The simple fact is that Yameen, fully encouraged by his Chinese friends, is pushing us to test the limits of our power. The question is when will Delhi say enough is enough and start tightening the screws on this corrupt and ruthless dictator? He has imprisoned practically everyone who opposes him and has been assiduously working against our interest from the day he has come to power. As a first step, we can start identifying all the Maldivians living in Trivandrum, Chennai and Bangalore and deport them, irrespective of the validity of their visas. By all accounts there are far more Maldivians living in southern India, either for educating their children or for medical treatment of their family and friends in various hospitals in the three Southern capitals. Visa is always a reciprocal arrangement. You throw out our citizens and we do the same to you. And this move may still not violate our assurances to China, in case we are afraid of that! Secondly, it’s time we went beyond platitudes and lip sympathy for the cause of democracy in the Maldives. Yameen’s tyranny has exceeded all limits of tolerance. The two former Presidents Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and Mohamed Nasheed always considered a democratic India as a best bet in their fight against the dictator. But we have repeatedly let our friends down. It’s time we stood by something worthwhile, because any talk of ‘muscular foreign policy’ has become a bit trite now.
This commentary originally appeared in the Economic Times.  
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Editor

Anjali Birla

Anjali Birla

Anjali Birla is an Indian Civil Services Officer(Batch 2020) working in the Ministry of Railways and has done her graduation in Political Science from Delhi ...

Read More +