Author : Chaitanya Giri

Expert Speak Space Tracker
Published on Aug 08, 2024

As India treads on the path of expanding its human spaceflight diplomacy, it will be fructifying for it to work on a few iCET-like bilateral initiatives with other countries

Gaganyaan must trigger more iCET-like bilaterals

Call it a tale of two ‘Axioms’—‘Axiom Research Labs’, better known as Team Indus, founded in 2010 in Bengaluru; and the second, ‘Axiom Space, founded in 2016 in Houston. Both are related to the India-United States (US) space cooperation, and both intend to play in the realms of emerging global cis-lunar architecture. The Indian Axiom was built by Indians, but due to a lack of opportunities for commercial space entities, back in 2017, it got assimilated into the US commercial space ecosystem. The American Axiom was built by American and international talent who were magnetically attracted to the flourishing US commercial space sector. The story and fate of both entities call for an analysis as India is on the cusp of reaching an important milestone on the path of its human spaceflight diplomacy.

In a pathbreaking announcement by the Minister of State, Dr Jitendra Singh, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has signed a Space Flight Agreement with Axiom Space as part of a joint mission with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), to transport one Gaganyatri (Indian astronaut) to the International Space Station. The Indian Gaganyatriprime candidate Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla or reserve candidate Group Captain Prasanth Nair (both from the Indian Air Force)—will pilot the mission, which is now designated as Axiom Mission 4 (AM4) and is scheduled for launch in October 2024. The spacecraft commander is the former Chief of the US Astronaut Office, Peggy Whitson, who, at present, is the world’s longest space-residing astronaut. The mission would be joined by two non-career astronauts from Poland and Hungary. AM4 is among the crucial precursor missions for Axiom Space as it prepares to launch three modules of its space station in the next five years—the first module branching from the existing ISS structure. In the long run, Axiom Space intends to raise and operate a commercial space station.

The Indian Gaganyatri—prime candidate Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla or reserve candidate Group Captain Prasanth Nair (both from the Indian Air Force)—will pilot the mission, which is now designated as Axiom Mission 4 (AM4) and is scheduled for launch in October 2024.

Since the announcement of India’s human spaceflight programme, and in particular, the Gaganyaan mission in 2018, ISRO has received cooperation on space medicine from the French space agency, CNES, and spaceflight training by the Russian Roscosmos. The US was conspicuously absent on these matters despite an active India-US Joint Working Group on Civil Space Cooperation, established in 2005. The Working Group tremendously helped the Indian Chandrayaan missions, but it had no human spaceflight component. Later, in 2014, after the near-simultaneous launch of ISRO’s Mars Orbiter Mission and NASA’s Maven spacecraft to Mars, both ISRO and NASA established the Mars Working Group, but no human spaceflight component was attached. The missing element of the bilateral space cooperation demanded convergence of political visions that are beyond the remit of national space agencies. That role was best suited for the National Security Advisor position in both nations.

As is evident from the bilateral space cooperation, human spaceflight requires the convergence of talents from civilian space and scientific agencies, defence establishments, and commercial entities. Space agencies do not have powers vested in them to bring these cohorts together. In the US, it is the National Space Council within the Executive Office of the President of the United States that has this converging ability. In India, it is the Space Commission within the Prime Minister’s Office that has the ability. And in both these bodies, the professional position with the convening power is that of the National Security Advisor. To that end, the NSA-led US-India initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET), established in May 2022, gave tremendous emphasis on human spaceflight, commercial lunar exploration, and commercial space partnerships, something that was not possible within the ambits of their civil space cooperation framework.

Given the natural affinity between India and the US tech ecosystems, it is natural for the bilateral to proceed exceedingly well compared to any of India's space cooperation bilaterals. However, in the long run, India will have to chart its course when it comes to making the domestic commercial space ecosystem globally competitive.

Given the natural affinity between India and the US tech ecosystems, it is natural for the bilateral to proceed exceedingly well compared to any of India's space cooperation bilaterals.

When it comes to the space sector, the US is a resource magnet, attracting talent and investments. The case in point is the Indian company Axiom Research Labs (ARL) or Team Indus. It participated in the 2010 Google Lunar X Prize contest and was among the finalists selected in this contest to launch its in-house built lander and rover. Despite its success, ARL did not find much traction for its futuristic services in India prior to 2018. But the US ecosystem found it useful and ARL moved its attention to the NASA Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) programme that contracts companies partaking in the development of payloads assisting exploration of the lunar south pole, extraction of resources, and developing technologies necessitated for long-duration lunar habitation. On different occasions, it partnered with American companies OrbitBeyond and Ceres Robotics, both interested in CLPS and intending to share its expertise and intellectual property. India’s lunar exploration programme was too nascent to then accommodate ARL’s commercial services.

Likewise, the US has created the Artemis Program for the same purpose of attracting financial, human resource, and technological resources that its partner countries generate. China thinks the same when it attracts international partners to side with its International Lunar Resource Station megaproject. The unhealthiness comes from the inability of Indian private players to undergo the experiential learning that happens when they work with space ecosystems of various countries. This experience with multiple players is extremely crucial from the standpoint of strategic autonomy.

India’s human spaceflight diplomacy, at a space agency level, is not one-sided. It has engagements with Paris through the India-France Strategic Space Dialogue and Moscow through the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. As India proceeds with the R&D of the Bharatiya Antariksh Station (BAS), it will definitely have to avail commercial space partnerships with entities emerging from countries across geopolitical blocs. Just like AM4 is carrying Hungarian and Polish astronauts, India will also have to bring astronauts and the commercial ecosystems of their countries to its BAS fold.

India’s human spaceflight diplomacy, at a space agency level, is not one-sided. It has engagements with Paris through the India-France Strategic Space Dialogue and Moscow through the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership.

India’s partnership with the US ecosystem is undoubtedly helpful. Still, if India intends to engage multi-country astronauts on the BAS, it will have to plug its human spaceflight diplomacy—and through it, its civil, commercial, and defence ecosystems—crisscrossing international geopolitical blocs. Let us not assume this to be merely a peaceable overture. The core of human spaceflight diplomacy is to ensure operational interoperability, psychosocial familiarity with diverse, competent cohorts working in the extreme, demanding and confined environments of outer space, and always developing commercially available contingencies with various partners in the network. Treat these like the military exercises that our forces engage in. India’s ability to work with compatible partners on human spaceflight will be an indicator of our high-tech strategic autonomy. That strategic autonomy is not restricted to the realms of ISRO; it extends into our commercial space ecosystem. It will be fructifying for India to work on a few other iCET-like bilateral ‘human spaceflight’ initiatives with other countries. After all, Indian commercial space entities must be enabled to get into the global human spaceflight and cis-lunar architecture business and become multinational giants.


Chaitanya Giri is a Fellow with the Centre for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Observer Research Foundation.

The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Author

Chaitanya Giri

Chaitanya Giri

Dr. Chaitanya Giri is a Fellow at ORF’s Centre for Security, Strategy and Technology. His work focuses on India’s space ecosystem and its interlinkages with ...

Read More +