Search

पहलगाम हल्ल्याच्या पार्श्वभूमीवर संपूर्ण काश्मीर खोऱ्�

Pahalgam attack triggers Valley-wide outrage against Pakistan; Kashmiris reject terror, marking a turning point in public sentiment and support for In

कारगिल संघर्षामुळे भारत आणि पाकिस्तान दोन्ही देशांच्या

The Kargil War highlighted the need for clear nuclear doctrines and strong command systems to manage escalation risks for both India and Pakistan

Despite being the immediate neighbour, India has chosen to follow a no-reaction policy towards the ongoing turmoil in Pakistan

Beijing’s growing interest in co-conspiring with Pakistan on Afghan soil adds to the growing tensions in the subcontinent, heightening concern over

India should not fall for hyped up fears of nuclear escalation; Pakistan is a rational actor that understands the limitations of nuclear weapons

The importance of Air Defence (AD) in modern warfare has never been in doubt. It remains relevant, as “Operation Sindoor” demonstrated. AD systems have historically played a key role in the Order of Battle (ORBAT) of both India and Pakistan; they were put to the test during their recent military confrontation. This brief provides an overview of India’s and Pakistan’s AD systems, highlighting the relative strengths of the two countries’

Moscow seems to stop halfway when it comes to providing political support for Delhi’s case, steering clear of making any critical remarks towards Islamabad

Chauhan has served many commands and staff postings in the North and Northeast. As major general, he commanded the Baramulla-based 19th Infantry Division in the Northern Command. So, he has invaluable experience in countering cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. His biggest strength, however, is his stint in the China-facing Eastern Command, from where he retired as commander in May 2021.

India has many reasons to nurse a nuclear grievance against China. For, Beijing's decision to arm Pakistan with nuclear weapons has given Rawalpindi the impunity to pursue cross-border terrorism against India. But Delhi has no reason at all to blame Beijing for its own failures on the nuclear policy front.

Has New Delhi forgotten its breast beating against cross-border terrorism in Kashmir atleast since 1989? How will it ever raise that issue again having voted along with the west which stands for cross border terrorism by US, France, UK, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey against Syria?

India’s emergent techno-military doctrine is redefining calibrated escalation to impose the cost of ‘fighting without victory’ on Pakistan within the nuclear environment.

Countries in the Subcontinent must realise that the benefits that Pakistan could bring to the region are rapidly declining

India has asserted an edgier counter-terror doctrine: credible, calibrated, and coercive

The Modi government appears to have abandoned the multi-pronged policy of its predecessor of simultaneously engaging Islamabad and dealing with cross-border terrorism. This government made a surprise beginning with the idea of promoting South Asian unity . But since then it has been fixated on countering terrorism at the cost of everything else, though Pakistani covert activity in India has seen a sharp decline since 2008.

The revised length of India’s coastline has also thrown up a critical reality of the diminished difference of India’s territorial and maritime borders.

भारताची नव्याने उदयास येणारी तंत्रज्ञान-आधारित लष्करी धोरणे ही अण्वस्त्रांच्या पार्श्वभूमीवर पाकिस्तानवर "विजयाशिवाय लढाई" ची किंमत लादण्याच्या उद्देशाने पायाभूत बद

भारताने आता दहशतवादाविरोधात अधिक ठोस आणि कडक धोरण स्वीकारलं आहे ते म्हणजे, विश्वास मिळवणारं, काळजीपूर्वक पावलं टाकणारं आणि गरज पडल्यास दबाव आणणारं.

उपखंडातील देशांनी हे लक्षात घेतले पाहिजे की पाकिस्तान या प्रदेशात आणू शकणारे फायदे झपाट्याने कमी होत आहेत.

पहलगाममधील हिरवेगार मैदाने या आठवड्यात निष्पाप रक्ताने माखली गेली आणि २००८ नंतर भारतासाठी हा सर्वात वेदनादायक दहशतवादी हल्ला ठरला. या क्रूर हत्याकांडामागे पाकिस्तानच�