A day after US President Donald Trump’s decision to pull forces from Syria and hours after the resignation of Secretary of Defense James Mattis was made public, Washington announced its surprising plan to bring back 7,000 troops from Afghanistan. With this reduction, nearly half of all US forces in Afghanistan will be brought back, slashing American military presence down to its lowest levels since 2002. The announcement itself was not surprising, given Trump’s election campaign and his political base but the timing came as a shock to many in and outside the US. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who has at times supported Trump, has warned that “the conditions in Afghanistan – at the present moment – make American troop withdrawals a high risk strategy. If we continue on our present course we are setting in motion the loss of all our gains and paving the way toward a second 9/11.”
That Trump was moving towards some sort of withdrawal from Afghanistan was clear when Zalmay Khalilzad was appointed as the US special representative for Afghanistan reconciliation in September. Khalilzad has been trying to resuscitate struggling peace talks and just last week an American delegation concluded three days of talks with the Taliban in Abu Dhabi. But Trump’s announcement will undercut these talks precisely at a time when a message of resolve needed to go out from Washington. The Taliban had always demanded a complete withdrawal of the US forces from Afghanistan and the US seems to be giving in to this demand almost under duress. It will embolden the Taliban and their backers and weaken the hand of the American negotiators significantly. The Taliban have little incentive to agree to any deal quickly. They can wait and watch especially now that Trump has underscored his desire to get out irrespective of the cost.
Despite America’s concerted air strikes against the Taliban, the Afghan government control seems to have fallen to a record low to 56 percent of the country’s districts and that Afghan National Security Forces have had a rather high attrition rate. The US military’s support remains critical for them to hold on against the Taliban onslaught. Political realignment in Afghanistan is also on cards with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, who has decided to contest Presidential elections in April 2019, recently replacing two of the country's top security chiefs with staunch anti-Taliban and anti-Pakistan officials. The Afghan government has been equally surprised by America’s announcement. In fact, Ghani had announced his peace plan in November with a five-year time-frame, linking peace talks to his next presidential term should he win in April. The Taliban have refused to deal directly with the government in Kabul, which it considers an illegitimate foreign-imposed regime.
Pakistan has leveraged its centrality in America’s Afghanistan policy for decades now, securing billions of dollars in US civilian and military aid. Given the geographical constraints facing the US supply lines, reliance on Pakistan has been a constant. But Trump had put Pakistan on notice by placing it alongside North Korea and Iran, countries which are being watched closely by his administration. And this year the Trump administration withheld around $800 million in aid to Pakistan. While outlining his South Asia strategy, Trump explicitly accused Islamabad of "often" giving "safe havens to agents of chaos, violence and terror.”
Now Pakistan is back in the game with America making clear its intent of leaving Afghanistan and desiring the return of the Taliban to the negotiating table. Pakistan’s backing for its proxies will intensify even as other regional players like Russia and Iran join in. A gradual descent into a civil war is likely as various regional stakeholders try to reshape the battlefield in accordance with their own strategic priorities counting on American forces to eventually leave.
India has also been reassessing its Afghanistan policy for some time now even as it awaits details about the time-frame and the structure of remaining American troops in Afghanistan. While New Delhi had welcomed Trump’s South Asia policy which gave India a prominent role, it was evident that Trump cannot be relied upon for the long haul. “We appreciate India’s important contributions to stability in Afghanistan, but India makes billions of dollars in trade with the US, and we want them to help us more with Afghanistan, especially in the area of economic assistance and development,” Trump had suggested, underlining India’s role in Afghanistan and the need to do much more. New Delhi’s role in Afghanistan has grown and in one of its recent reports the US Department of Defense laid this out by suggesting that India is Afghanistan's most reliable regional partner and the largest contributor of development assistance in the region.
India’s engagements with Russia and China on Afghanistan have also gained momentum over the last few months. As part of the “India-China plus” initiative, New Delhi and Beijing have identified Afghanistan as the country where the two nations would forge a partnership. Joint training of Afghan diplomats has already begun and joint infrastructure projects in Afghanistan are being discussed. India is also engaged with Russia on the peace process though it continues to have its reservations.
Indian presence in Afghanistan has indeed been underwritten by American military presence in the country but New Delhi has been one of the most credible players in Afghanistan. Now as American once again revisit its policy options, India should be prepared to fight its own battles.
This commentary originally appeared in Mail Today.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
Professor Harsh V. Pant is Vice President – Studies and Foreign Policy at Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. He is a Professor of International Relations ...
Read More +
PREV
