Expert Speak Digital Frontiers
Published on May 16, 2023
Data is the next big chasm for regulators to cross, with its growing importance in the financial system and the challenges in its management
Why data is a double-edged sword for financial supervision The rise of Digital Financial Services (DFS) and the growing consumption of financial services, particularly in emerging markets and being instruments of financial inclusion, has underscored the importance of robust financial supervision. As the financial industry continues to innovate and evolve, it is essential that regulatory frameworks keep pace with these changes.

Financial supervision

Financial supervision is needed not only to ensure the stability and safety of the financial system but also to protect the interests of consumers and investors. The financial system plays a critical role in the economy, as it enables the efficient allocation of resources, facilitates economic growth, and provides financing for businesses and individuals. However, financial institutions can also pose risks to the economy and consumers if not properly supervised. These risks include systemic ones, such as the risk of financial contagion or a collapse of the financial system, as well as risks to individual consumers and investors, such as fraud or mismanagement of funds.
The financial system plays a critical role in the economy, as it enables the efficient allocation of resources, facilitates economic growth, and provides financing for businesses and individuals.
Such risks can be mitigated and prevented by ensuring that financial institutions are operating safely and soundly, and are complying with laws and regulations designed for their functioning. Financial supervisors monitor and assess the financial health and risk profile of financial institutions; it works best if the early warning signals prompt them to take timely and appropriate action to address any problems in the form of corrective actions. In this scenario, the time-consuming and somewhat costly process of data reporting needs to be accepted and innovations need to be undertaken.

Data is the essence

Data is the lifeblood of financial supervision and is the foundation upon which effective financial supervision is built. Without reliable and consistent data, it is impossible for financial supervisors to effectively monitor the activities of financial institutions and identify potential risks to the stability of the financial system. However, data is often dispersed across multiple systems and institutions, lacking standardisation and formats, thus, making it difficult to compare and analyse. Therefore, building common data standards and ensuring data governance with data symmetry is crucial for effective financial supervision. Data governance, data symmetry, and unified data standards are critical components of building effective financial supervision. These measures enable regulators to gain a comprehensive understanding of the risks and opportunities in the financial system and to respond quickly and effectively to emerging threats. Further, weak DFS data collection practices, such as inconsistent use of key DFS concepts, duplicate reporting requirements, and so forth, can lead to poor data quality or higher compliance costs. In order to identify risks and ensure the stability of the financial system, regulators rely on accurate, timely, and comprehensive data from financial institutions and other sources. For example, banks are required to report information on their assets, liabilities, and capital positions to regulators frequently.
In order to identify risks and ensure the stability of the financial system, regulators rely on accurate, timely, and comprehensive data from financial institutions and other sources.
In addition to data reported by financial institutions, regulators also rely on data from other sources such as credit rating agencies, market data providers, and consumer credit bureaus. For example, credit rating agencies provide information on the creditworthiness of individual borrowers and the debt securities issued by companies and governments. Market data providers supply information on market prices, trading volumes, and other market metrics that can be used to identify trends and anomalies in financial markets. Consumer credit bureaus provide information on individuals' credit histories and borrowing behaviour, which can be used to assess the credit risk of individual borrowers and to monitor trends in consumer borrowing and spending. Financial regulators face significant challenges when it comes to managing and analysing data. These challenges stem from a variety of factors, including the sheer volume and complexity of financial data, the lack of standardisation in data formats and reporting requirements, and the rapid pace of technological change in the financial industry. One of the main challenges facing financial regulators is the sheer volume and complexity of financial data. Financial institutions generate massive amounts of data on a daily basis, including data on transactions, customer information, and risk exposures. This data is often spread across multiple systems and databases, making it difficult to access and analyse.

Measures to be taken

  • Firstly, by establishing common data standards, financial supervisors can improve the accuracy of risk assessments. This can help supervisors to identify emerging risks more quickly and take appropriate measures to mitigate them before they become systemic. Improved risk assessments can also help to reduce the likelihood of financial crises. Common data standards are essential for improving data quality and consistency across different systems and institutions. By establishing a common data model and standardised reporting requirements, financial supervisors can ensure that they have access to reliable and comparable data. This can improve the accuracy of risk assessments and enable supervisors to identify potential risks more quickly.
  • Secondly, data symmetry and standardisation can improve the quality of data used by financial institutions and regulators. Data symmetry refers to the concept of ensuring that data is consistent across different systems and institutions. This requires robust data governance frameworks that ensure that data is accurate, complete, and up-to-date. By ensuring data symmetry, financial supervisors can be confident that they are working with accurate and reliable data, which is essential for effective supervision. This can enable regulators to better monitor financial institutions and identify potential weaknesses or vulnerabilities in their operations. This, in turn, can help prevent financial institutions from taking excessive risks and reduce the likelihood of financial crises. By providing more consistent and reliable data, regulators and other stakeholders can more easily identify potential conflicts of interest, unethical behaviour, or fraudulent activity in financial institutions. This can help reduce the likelihood of financial scandals and improve confidence in the financial system. In addition to improving the accuracy and reliability of data, common data standards and data governance with data symmetry can also improve the efficiency of financial supervision. By reducing the time and effort required to collect and analyse data, financial supervisors can focus on more value-adding activities, such as identifying emerging risks and working with financial institutions to mitigate them. This can help to reduce the costs of financial supervision.
  • Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain have the potential to transform financial supervision by enhancing data governance and symmetry. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to identify patterns and anomalies in large datasets, helping regulators to detect fraud, money laundering, and other illicit activities. Blockchain technology can also be used to improve data governance and symmetry by providing a secure and transparent ledger that can be used to track transactions across the financial system. This could help to reduce the risk of fraud and improve the efficiency of regulatory processes. Despite these technological advancements, it is essential that regulators continue to prioritise data governance, data symmetry, and unified data standards.

Challenges 

However, implementing common data standards and data governance with data symmetry is not without its challenges. One of the main challenges is the need for international cooperation and standardisation. Financial transactions are increasingly global, and financial institutions operate across borders. Therefore, it is essential to have standardised data reporting and information sharing across different jurisdictions to enable effective cross-border supervision. In India, these common data standards can be used by all financial regulators and non-financial regulators.
By reducing the time and effort required to collect and analyse data, financial supervisors can focus on more value-adding activities, such as identifying emerging risks and working with financial institutions to mitigate them.
Another challenge is the need for significant investment in technology and infrastructure. Financial supervisors must also ensure that they have the necessary expertise and resources to effectively use data and interpret the data they generate. There is also the need to balance the benefits of data collection and analysis with the need to protect individual privacy and confidentiality. Financial data often contains sensitive information about individuals and companies, and regulators must take care to ensure that this information is protected and used only for legitimate regulatory purposes. Data is the next big chasm for regulators to cross because of its growing importance in the financial system and the challenges in managing and analysing this data. To address these challenges, regulators must invest in new technology and expertise, collaborate with financial institutions and other stakeholders, and develop new data standards and methodologies to support effective financial supervision and regulation.
Dakshita Das heads the Government Committee on Gender Budgeting and is the Government nominee on the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Contributor

Dakshita Das

Dakshita Das

Dakshita Das is a graduate from Lady Shriram College for Women New Delhi Dakshita Das joined the Civil Services in 1986. She has over 35 ...

Read More +