-
CENTRES
Progammes & Centres
Location
A year-end playback of the anxieties and arguments that kept public health at the centre of India’s conversations in 2025.
Image Source: Getty Images
Every year in December, social media feeds fill up with other people’s data: Spotify’s most played tracks, YouTube’s rewind feature. Reddit’s annual self-portrait for the user. This piece is a more prosaic cousin of those rituals. Using Google’s news tab as a crude mirror, it scans roughly 30 pages of results for the keywords “India” + “Health” in each 15-day slice of 2025 (10 articles per page). The algorithm is hardly a neutral archivist, considering news suggestions are shaped by location, language, past clicks, and the platforms’ own commercial raison d’être. Even with that caveat, the issues that keep surfacing are clearly not minor. What follows is a rewind of those recurring moments as an attempt to map the public health worries that 2025 kept pushing back onto India’s screen.
The Economic Survey’s new attentiveness to ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and HFSS (High in Fat, Sugar, and Salt) products, long working hours, and mental health is an admission that lifestyle has slipped out of the private sphere into the realm of macroeconomics, yet the Union Budget that followed channels this insight into familiar grooves; more medical seats, more tertiary capacity, and a renewed focus toward medical tourism. In parallel, the Maha Kumbh becomes a very different kind of statement about national capacity: it demonstrates a massive exercise in modern crowd management, sanitation, and surveillance deployed to move tens of millions of people through sacred water, even as concerns about the quality of water sat uneasily beneath the event.
Figure 1: Early 2025 sketches the Opening Tracklist
Source: Compiled by Author from (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7)
The other entries in Figure 1 pull the focus closer to questions of who will actually deliver care, and on whose terms. Blinkit’s entry into app-booked ambulances is a revealing experiment in stretching last-mile logistics from groceries to emergency transport, compressing the ambulance into just another on-demand product. The danger is that emergency care drifts into a regulatory grey zone where response times and geography may follow patterns of paying demand rather than public health need.
The danger is that emergency care drifts into a regulatory grey zone where response times and geography may follow patterns of paying demand rather than public health need.
With Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy finally in the market to compete with Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro, and its KwikPen format approved soon after, the two multinationals compete for a high-margin niche in obesity and diabetes care, with monthly courses typically priced in the INR 15,000–INR 25,000 range, that only a small, affluent slice of Indians can realistically afford. In parallel, the Adani Group announced Adani Health City—in partnership with Mayo Clinic—promising two 1,000-bed hospital–medical college campuses in Mumbai and Ahmedabad on an INR 6,000-crore investment. The juxtaposition is telling that at one end, global pharmaceuticals sell weekly injections that embody the bio-luxury of weight loss; at the other, a conglomerate is building large teaching hospitals and medical colleges that will anchor specialist training and referral patterns in its part of the country. A timeline of these mid-year events is set out in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Mid-2025 lines up the new Power Players
Source: Compiled by Author from (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8)
The India-United Kingdom free trade (FTA) deal put food policy and public health on a collision course. Commentaries on the FTA have warned that tariff-free or cheaper entry for British chocolates, soft drinks and other HFSS products will deepen an already aggressive UPF environment for Indian children, explicitly drawing on Mexico’s post-NAFTA (North American FTA) experience, where a flood of sugary imports preceded a sharp rise in obesity and diabetes until taxes and warning labels were imposed years later. In the same quarter, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) had mandated schools to put up ‘sugar boards’ that spell out recommended daily sugar intake and list the sugar load in familiar snacks and drinks. HFSS products from Indian and foreign companies are already widely available; the FTA would ease access for another set of imported brands. At the same time, another arm of the state mandates schools to display boards in their corridors, explaining how such products contribute to the obesity problem. A snapshot of these mid-year flashpoints is set out in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Mid-2025 puts Food and Trust under the Public Lens
Source: Compiled by Author from (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12)
Early in the year, the Adani group announced ‘Health Cities’. More recently, a large-scale project announced by another private player outlines a parallel vision: a 2,000-bed ‘medical city’ in Mumbai, pitched as a globally staffed hub with its own medical college. These moves extend the earlier corporate-education story into a broader realignment: control over teaching pipelines and research facilities may gradually concentrate in a few private players, and the same projects that are framed as social investment also strengthen their long-term position in the healthcare market. Around the same time, explainers tracked how control of India’s private hospitals has shifted towards Private Equity/Venture Capital (PE-VC) healthcare investments in recent years, and foreign funds now holding major stakes in several large chains. A toxic cough-syrup tragedy in Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh/MP) then supplied a brutal counterpoint to these big-ticket deals: children dying after consuming a locally sold syrup laced with diethylene glycol, World Health Organization (WHO) alerts, state-wide bans and enforcement raids further exposing adulterated raw materials and failed inspections.
At the street level, the arguments may appear very different but are ultimately about trust in institutions. In August, the Supreme Court’s tussle with Delhi over stray dogs forced a national conversation about whose risk counts: residents who report dog bites a day and rabies cases in the capital, or animal-welfare groups worried about mass incarceration and killing, with the Court having to eventually soften its earlier directions.
Delhi’s winter smog remains the clearest example of how India’s safety nets still work backwards. Each October and November, the city cycles through the same choreography of court orders, partial bans on firecrackers, emergency measures, and severe Air Quality Index days. Yet the response architecture is still built around short bursts of crisis management rather than year-round investment. The nuance is that Delhi’s residents are not passive actors in this story. A political reluctance to alienate either urban voters or farmers exists alongside structural issues such as brick kilns and crop burning in neighbouring states. The result is a recurring emergency that is formally nobody’s fault and everybody’s problem.
That sits with the rhetoric of digital health as an efficiency gain for an overstretched system; if the human skills at the centre of telemedicine are systematically undervalued, the model becomes another way of extracting time from professionals.
At the same time, the Apollo telehealth pay controversy shows how thin the net can be when it comes to workers. An offer to pay qualified doctors the price of a snack per teleconsultation, layered with penalties for missed or transferred calls, makes clear that some platform models may treat clinical labour as the cheapest adjustable input in a growth strategy. That sits with the rhetoric of digital health as an efficiency gain for an overstretched system; if the human skills at the centre of telemedicine are systematically undervalued, the model becomes another way of extracting time from professionals.
The late-year debate on a legal ‘right to disconnect’ also hints at a growing recognition that safety nets are also about time and attention. A bill that proposes formal limits on after-hours work contact will not transform Indian labour norms overnight, and it is easiest to imagine such protections applying to a narrow band of salaried, white-collar employees rather than to nurses, resident doctors or contractual health workers. Even so, its appearance in Parliament signals that work-life boundaries have moved into legislative language. A snapshot of these late-year events is set out in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Late 2025 and India’s Health Safety Nets
Source: Compiled by Author from (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15)
Across the year, the same concerns kept resurfacing in different guises: the air people breathe, the food they buy, and the hazards built into the street outside their front door. Indians were being asked to navigate an environment where risk is ambient and diffused, with responsibility pushed downwards to parents and consumers. Running alongside this was a clear story about the people who hold the system together. The workforce was treated as both scarce and expendable. A third thread tied the year together: health as a domain where capital, technology and diplomacy moved fast. A schematic overview of these cross-cutting themes in 2025 is presented in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Representative Themes that cut across India’s Public Health Conversations in 2025.
Looking to 2026, the question is less whether India will add new health initiatives and more whether it will close the gaps that make so many of these stories feel like déjà vu. Air-quality plans, HFSS regulation, medical education expansion and digital health pilots already exist. The test for the coming year is whether they begin to function as real safety nets rather than as annual talking points. If any platforms do a ‘Rewind 2026’ for public health a year from now, the hopeful version would show fewer repeat tracks, and a system where big bets on technology and capital rest on a sturdier foundation of trust, regulation and everyday protection.
K.S. Uplabdh Gopal is an Associate Fellow with the Health Initiative at the Observer Research Foundation.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
Dr. K. S. Uplabdh Gopal is an Associate Fellow with the Health Initiative at the Observer Research Foundation. He writes and researches on how India’s ...
Read More +
PREV
