Plastic in the Urban Veins: Towards Circular and Climate-Resilient Cities

Image Source: Getty

As the monsoon approaches, Indian cities once again face the familiar threat of clogged drains, flooded streets, and overflowing landfills—symptoms of a deeper, more chronic crisis. Plastic waste, largely uncollected and poorly managed, chokes stormwater systems and magnifies the impact of extreme weather. According to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, waste generated in Tier 1 cities accounts for 72.5 percent of the total waste generated per day. India generates 4.1 million tonnes of plastic waste annually, out of which, more than 40 percent remains uncollected. What is collected is often mixed with organic and hazardous waste, making recycling difficult. In cities like Bengaluru and Mumbai, where daily waste exceeds 9,000 tonnes, plastic pollution is no longer just an environmental nuisance—it is a structural failure of planning, design, and governance. The 2023 Bengaluru floods, worsened by plastic-choked drains, exposed how unmanaged waste can undermine urban resilience. As World Environment Day 2025 calls attention to combatting plastic pollution, it is time to confront it not as a sanitation issue, but as a barrier to building climate-resilient cities.

Despite increasing policy attention to plastic waste management, India’s urban response remains fragmented and largely reactive. The Plastic Waste Management Rules (amended in 2021) have mandated Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), but implementation has faltered due to capacity constraints at the municipal level and a lack of traceability in the informal sector.

Despite increasing policy attention to plastic waste management, India’s urban response remains fragmented and largely reactive. The Plastic Waste Management Rules (amended in 2021) have mandated Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), but implementation has faltered due to capacity constraints at the municipal level and a lack of traceability in the informal sector. State-level bans on single-use plastics have proven difficult to enforce, especially in markets and among small vendors. Municipalities remain underfunded and overburdened, with solid waste management constituting a minor portion of urban development budgets. Much like India’s early approach to managing heatwaves—limited to issuing alerts without upgrading infrastructure—plastic waste management continues to be treated as an auxiliary function rather than a core pillar of climate-resilient planning. The result is a deeply linear economy in cities: one that takes, uses, and dumps, with few systems in place for reuse, recovery, or regeneration.

A systems transformation toward circular cities is essential. However, this transition must acknowledge the uneven terrain on which Indian cities operate. Nearly 80 percent of the recycling economy is informal. Lakhs of waste pickers, often women and Dalits, manually collect and sort plastic waste with little protection, income security, or institutional support. Municipalities rarely integrate these workers into formal service delivery, and in most cities, there is no database of who they are or where they work. This exclusion undermines recovery rates and reinforces social inequities. For example, Delhi’s attempts to automate collection have displaced thousands of informal workers without alternative livelihoods. In contrast, cities like Pune have shown that cooperatives such as SWaCH can bridge the gap, offering social protection while enhancing service efficiency. A just transition toward circularity must therefore be people-centred—recognising the informal sector as a climate ally, not a regulatory burden.

India’s urban development schemes—Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, and Swachh Bharat Abhiyan—have begun building infrastructure for waste collection, transportation, and processing. But these investments remain unevenly distributed, with wealthier Tier-I cities capturing the bulk of funding while smaller towns and peri-urban settlements lag. Moreover, these schemes lack a unified circular economy vision. Climate action plans under the C-CAP initiative rarely include material flow assessments or set recovery targets for high-leakage materials like multilayered plastics. Waste-to-Energy plants, often backed under public-private partnerships, remain controversial due to the low calorific value of Indian waste and the emission of toxins when burning plastic. Chennai, for instance, faces local resistance against its WTE plant over air quality and land-use concerns. Without upstream reforms—segregation at source, design for recyclability, and waste audits—technology-driven solutions will continue to underperform.

The absence of mandates for public procurement of recycled content or subsidies for reusable packaging keeps the circular business models niche. Local governments, constrained by fiscal deficits, are unable to underwrite the transition costs for circular innovations.

Reform must begin at the point of design and procurement. Indian cities continue to rely on linear supply chains for packaging and materials, with procurement guidelines rarely considering circularity. There are few incentives for bulk consumers—hotels, markets, e-commerce warehouses—to shift away from single-use plastics. Bengaluru’s "Refill Hubs" pilot in government stores, where citizens refill cleaning products and staples, represents a promising shift, but such experiments need institutional scale and financing. The absence of mandates for public procurement of recycled content or subsidies for reusable packaging keeps the circular business models niche. Local governments, constrained by fiscal deficits, are unable to underwrite the transition costs for circular innovations.

Technology could be a powerful enabler, but is underutilised. Startups in Indian cities are piloting AI-based segregation, traceability platforms for EPR, and decentralised plastic-to-fuel units. However, many face regulatory bottlenecks, data inaccessibility, or weak municipal uptake. Unlike the relatively coordinated rollout of digital public goods in healthcare or finance, urban waste tech lacks systemic support. Cities do not maintain digitised, real-time dashboards of plastic flows or segregation performance. In contrast to cities like Amsterdam or Seoul that track materials through every node of the urban metabolism, Indian cities rely on manual reporting and sporadic audits. The National Urban Digital Mission offers an opportunity to institutionalise data-driven waste governance—through smart bins, geo-tagged collection routes, and open dashboards for public accountability.

India has positioned itself globally as a champion of sustainable lifestyles through its LiFE campaign and has led calls at the G20 and United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) for collective action on plastic pollution. Yet, if this global vision is to be credible, it must be backed by transformative change in India’s cities.

Communities—especially women-led households, resident welfare associations, and youth groups—can anchor behavioural transitions. Yet, public awareness campaigns remain sporadic and top-down. Behaviour change communications are often limited to poster drives or punitive fines, without fostering long-term collective ownership. Cities like Indore and Surat, which have climbed the cleanliness rankings, did so by coupling civic participation with decentralised infrastructure. Similarly, urban circularity efforts must be hyperlocal—linking community Material Recovery Facilities with micro-enterprises, and deploying reward-based models to incentivise low-waste behaviours. Plastic-free bazaars, zero-waste housing societies, and school-led audit programmes must move from pilot to policy.

The consequences of inaction are not distant—they are already unfolding. Plastics contribute directly to India’s emissions burden. Uncollected plastics clog storm drains, fuel landfill fires, and leach toxins into urban water systems. The public health fallout—ranging from microplastic ingestion to respiratory diseases—is already visible in high-density informal settlements where waste collection is weakest. In a warming world, plastic pollution acts as a threat amplifier—intensifying the frequency and scale of urban climate disasters. Cities that continue to manage waste in isolation from climate and health goals will remain locked in a reactive cycle—cleaning up after disasters rather than building resilience before they strike.

India has positioned itself globally as a champion of sustainable lifestyles through its LiFE campaign and has led calls at the G20 and United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) for collective action on plastic pollution. Yet, if this global vision is to be credible, it must be backed by transformative change in India’s cities. Combatting plastic pollution is no longer an issue of local cleanliness; it is a strategic imperative for national climate resilience, economic efficiency, and social equity. World Environment Day 2025 offers a moment not just for reflection but for redesign. The plastic crisis is an urban crisis, and solving it demands a new generation of Indian cities that are circular by principle, inclusive by design, and resilient by default.

Aparna Roy is a Fellow and Lead Climate Change and Energy at the Centre for New Economic Diplomacy (CNED) at the Observer Research Foundation.

• Climate, Food and Environment
• Urbanisation in India
• Urbanisation
• Climate Change
• India
• Plastic Pollution
• plastic pollution in india
• plastic waste
• Plastic Waste Management
• plastic waste management in india
• Plastic Waste Management Rules
• plastic waste management rules india
• swach cooperative
• world environment day
• world environment day 2025

The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

PREV NEXT