Expert Speak India Matters
Published on Oct 03, 2022
Fiscal policy must be leveraged to contain the impact of rising interest rates on growth.
Monetary policy must be complemented by fiscal policy

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has an impossible task. It must contain inflation without compromising growth, using four arrows in its quiver: Setting domestic interest rates; managing liquidity; using its foreign exchange war chest to fight exchange rate volatility, and the mandate to regulate banking operations—the last being an atypical central bank function. It can only hope for a supportive fiscal policy.

Dampening inflation by hiking interest rate

Synchronous interest rate action is a signal for international investors that a national monetary authority such as the RBI is determined to preserve stability. “Central banks are charting new territory with aggressive rate hikes, even if it entails sacrificing growth in the near term,” said RBI Governor, Shaktikanta Das, on 30 September 2022, highlighting thereby, the compulsion to tag the domestic interest rate to rate increases in the advanced economies, even though, unlike them, our economy never enjoyed the rush of stimulus financing which is a precursor for high inflation—a price paid for safeguarding household income and supporting the business through the pandemic downturn.

The combined fiscal deficit (FD) of the Union and state governments increased sharply from 7.2 percent of GDP in 2019-20 to 13.9 percent in 2020-21 and 10.4 percent in the succeeding year (2021-22).

Stimulus in India was at a lower level. The combined fiscal deficit (FD) of the Union and state governments increased sharply from 7.2 percent of GDP in 2019-20 to 13.9 percent in 2020-21 and 10.4 percent in the succeeding year (2021-22). However, our economy had been heating on a slow fire ever since the Global Financial Crisis (2008-10), where we witnessed an FD of 8.3 in 2008-09 and an FD of 9.3 in the following year 2009-10. Thereafter, instead of tapering to the notional FD target of 3 percent as per the Fiscal Responsibility and Budgetary Management Act 2004 (FRBM), FD hovered around 7 percent for nine of the intervening 10 years (2010-11 to 2019-20).

Fiscal policy perpetually above sustainable limits

Inflation expectations were, therefore, baked into the loose fiscal policy even prior to the twin supply shocks from the pandemic and the Ukraine crisis. This sapped the fiscal capacity for incremental stimulus, unlike in advanced economies, and permitted only a highly controlled and targeted fiscal policy during the pandemic.

Some supply price shocks might have become embedded into core inflation via permanent supply line reorientation because of reshoring or onshoring supply with a preference for domestic value addition and job creation. Additionally, loose fiscal policy dilutes the inflation-dampening impact of interest rate increases. The Union government’s FD will remain above 4.5 percent of GDP till 2025-26. Allowing another 2 percent FD for state governments takes the combined FD to around 6 percent of GDP level—a far cry from the 3 percent envisaged under the FRBM Act.

Protecting the domestic currency

The Monetary Policy Committee of the RBI (30 September  2022) increased the Repo rate—the rate at which commercial banks can borrow from the RBI—by 0.5 percent point from 5.40 to 5.90 percent, partly to keep domestic interest rates competitive to prevent capital flight—triggering a run on the currency. Such preemptive action by the RBI shows that it walks the talk on maintaining macroeconomic stability by building credibility and positive investor perceptions.

Inflation expectations were, therefore, baked into the loose fiscal policy even prior to the twin supply shocks from the pandemic and the Ukraine crisis.

The repo rate is now more than 2 percentage points higher than the United States Federal Funds rate of 3.75 percent. This is neither unusual nor capricious. During the Global Financial Crisis, the difference in interest rates varied between 4.75 to 6.25 percent. In India, a lower differential than earlier is justified by inflation that is at 7 percent, which was 1 percent (or more) lower than in the United States (US) and other advanced European economies. US Federal Reserve is expected to target an FF rate (upper bound) of between 4.5 to 5 percent by mid-2023. This means, just to retain the current differential, the repo rate could increase to between 6.5 to 7 percent before the fiscal year ends.

The reversal of an easy money policy by the Federal Reserve has appreciated the US dollar significantly against all currencies. In comparison to other international currencies, the Indian rupee has depreciated less—9 percent over the year to 28 September 2022 versus 23 percent for the Chinese yuan. This protects us from imported inflation but also harms export competitiveness and uses up foreign exchange reserves to withstand INR selling pressure.

Safeguarding growth

Changes in the repo rate target maintain a deft balance between managing the currency, containing inflation, and safeguarding growth. The repo rate was at 8 percent in May 2014 when the Modi government came to office. It reduced to 6 percent over the next three years, by August 2017. From April 2019, it gradually reduced to 4 percent in May 2020 where it stayed till April 2022. Between the five-month period from May 2022 to September 2022, it increased by 1.9 percent points to 5.9 percent in response to the tightening of international benchmark rates and domestic inflation at 7 percent in August 2022 versus the outside norm of 6 percent.

The Performance Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme of the Union government stimulates new private investments in an environment of rising interest rates and global uncertainty.

Complementary fiscal policy is better suited to kindle growth and dilute fuel and food price shocks through transfers. The Performance Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme of the Union government stimulates new private investments in an environment of rising interest rates and global uncertainty. Corporate taxes were reduced to competitive levels of 25 percent in 2019. Liquidity constraints were eased by the RBI during the run-up to the pandemic and remain easy even today.

Missing growth impetus

Growth has been low even before the pandemic. The RBI has decreased the forecasted growth rate for the current fiscal from 7.2 percent to 7 percent. More downward revisions could follow. Q1 2022-23 growth data of 14 percent enjoys the optical benefit of a low, pandemic-induced GDP base in Q1 2021-22 of INR 32.5 trillion. Using as an alternative base, the GDP of Q1 2019-20 of INR 35.7 trillion—the last normal quarter before the pandemic—growth rate slips from 14 percent to 3.3 percent.

The growth rate even in the last pre-pandemic quarter (Q1 2019-20) was just 5.4 percent. The economy, whilst recovering from the pandemic slowdown, is reverting to the same low-level output equilibrium it had before the pandemic. This is reflected in the RBI assessment of growth rates progressively reducing from 6 to 4 percent for the three remaining quarters of this fiscal. Considering adverse external circumstances and domestic rate increases, the projected growth of 7.2 percent for fiscal 2023-24 appears optimistic.

The extent to which an increase in the base rate will constrain growth remains unclear. The downstream impact of an increase in the base rate can be minimised for bank lending to productive sectors, by nudging banks to improve their operational efficiency. Over the last three years, banks have improved their asset portfolios and provisioned for losses. Whether prudent lending has been institutionalised is unclear. RBI needs to compress the cushion in the operating margin of banks to contain the impact of rising interest rates on growth.

The downstream impact of an increase in the base rate can be minimised for bank lending to productive sectors, by nudging banks to improve their operational efficiency.

Suppressed inflation pressures

Inflation pressures are building, contrary to RBI expectations of inflation at 6.7 percent this fiscal and 5 percent in 2023-24. Policy-induced inflation pressure emanates from higher import taxes and administered retail pricing regimes which have not passed through imported inflation fully in oil, fertiliser, and food. These pressures reflect in the expanded fiscal deficit of the government at a combined (Union and state governments) level of 10 percent plus of GDP—4 percent points higher than the outer sustainable levels. Some of the buoyancy in the tax revenue from ad valorem indirect taxes (GST) is also due to inflation getting baked into the price of goods and services, thereby, conveying an overgenerous impression of macroeconomic stability.

External account stability hinges on export growth

The RBI Governor listed some positives on the external front. Foreign Exchange reserves at US$ 537 billion remain adequate for more than eight months of import. Other positive metrics relate to the low volume of external debt to GDP and the low share of short-term debt. However, the trade deficit at 8 percent in Q1 2022-23 and the current account deficit of 2.58 percent remain worrisome, especially since export growth is constrained by lower demand overseas. The stock market, albeit volatile, remains resilient, relative to the turmoil overseas, and both FDI and portfolio inflows remain encouraging.

The bottom line is that the India story remains a fair one, both for domestic and overseas investors. Nevertheless, as options for additional tax revenues remain limited, this is a good time to deleverage and slim public budgetary outlays by enhancing the efficiency of public expenditure and looking closely at the efficacy and fiscal sustainability of hyperactive industrial policy in manufacturing and renewable energy. Rationalising GST and bringing import taxes in line with international best practices would impact revenue in the short term. However, this remains the best way to cut back on domestic price pressure, boost retail demand by leaving more surplus with the consumer and provide competitive pressure to make the domestic industry more efficient. The ball now lies squarely with fiscal policy.

The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.

Author

Sanjeev Ahluwalia

Sanjeev Ahluwalia

Sanjeev S. Ahluwalia has core skills in institutional analysis, energy and economic regulation and public financial management backed by eight years of project management experience ...

Read More +