While QUAD was renewed to maintain the rules-based order and a Free and Open Indo-Pacific, its semi-institutionalised format is significantly inhibiting its effectiveness
Image Source: Getty
The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) was conceived in the aftermath of the 2004 Tsunami and was later formally put into place in 2007, led by the late Shinzo Abe, to strengthen his vision to reimagine a new region—the Indo-Pacific. However, the reluctance of member states to form a group that could be perceived as an anti-China alliance, as well as aggressive campaigning by China, led to the debacle of Australia pulling out of the arrangement in 2008. The increasing belligerence of China and the changed geopolitical scenario with concepts such as the Free and Open Indo-Pacific(FOIP) and rule-based order gaining traction assisted in the rebirth of QUAD in 2017. However, learning from the past, the grouping rebranded itself as one which favours the Indo-Pacific region’s sustainable development, stability, and prosperity by delivering tangible benefits to its people. It acted in support of actions that respected the present rule-based order and strengthened existing regional institutions. To the countries of the Indo-Pacific, the renewed QUAD tacitly presented itself as an alternative against growing Chinese influence and hegemony, thereby maintaining stability in the region.
The increasing belligerence of China and the changed geopolitical scenario with concepts such as the Free and Open Indo-Pacific(FOIP) and rule-based order gaining traction assisted in the rebirth of QUAD in 2017.
Since its resurgence in 2017, there has been debate over QUAD being institutionalised to bring stability to its existence and the Indo-Pacific region at large. While some scholars believe that the QUAD has already been institutionalised, it is a fact that the grouping remains semi-institutionalised, as governments of the member states do not seem to favour its complete institutionalisation. The passing of the “Strengthening the QUAD Act” by the United States (US) House of Representatives on 26 February 2024, followed by institutionalisation processes undertaken by the governments within their ministries, are a few of the steps that have been taken towards the limited institutionalisation of QUAD. This semi-institutional form of grouping is supported by many who cite the challenges that exist due to the varied outlooks and non-converging national interests of the member states. However, the renewed QUAD’s aim is to provide an alternative to China in the Indo-Pacific and to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific is being severely impacted by the low levels of institutionalisation achieved.
QUAD has officially committed approximately US$1 billion to various programmes declared in the year 2024, while China has committed US$4 billion as a part of its Global Development Initiative (GDI) in the year 2023, and it is in the process of creating a US$10 billion special fund for further development. The funding process of QUAD today remains voluntary, based on member states’ willingness to contribute. The huge deficit that exists compared to the funding of GDI by China needs to be addressed by focused fund generation through an institutional organisation under QUAD. The role of the institutional body would be to project the requirement of funds, obtain willing contributions from its members and then coordinate deficit funding through the convergence of funds by various global financial institutes that are promoting such initiatives in the region.
The huge deficit that exists compared to the funding of GDI by China needs to be addressed by focused fund generation through an institutional organisation under QUAD.
The projects being undertaken under the climate and energy initiatives 2024 include providing 3D-printed automatic weather stations to the Pacific in 2025, which gives access to local weather and climate forecasts and includes the training of experts in Fiji by the US. Australia is supporting the strengthening of Early Warning Systems through Weather Ready Pacific, a Pacific-led initiative supported by the Pacific Islands Forum, and is steering a QUAD Clean Energy Supply Chains Diversification Program that looks at the diversification of supply chain resilience in the green energy sector.
Japan has committed itself to enhancing cooperation with Pacific Island countries under its "Pacific Climate Resilience Initiative” and has promised a US$122 million grant and loan, both public and private, for renewable energy projects. India has committed to invest US$2 million in new solar projects in the islands of Madagascar, Seychelles, Fiji and Comoros. The QUAD plans to train experts in Kiribati, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Vanuatu to better monitor and forecast flash floods. This clearly indicates that the order of priority for QUAD initiatives in the Indo-Pacific Region remains the West Pacific Region, the East and Southeast Asian Region and the Indian Ocean Region in order as mentioned. It also indicates that all the member states extend their contribution to projects in countries which favour their national interest. If the QUAD sees itself as an institution with the mandate of ensuring regional stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific, then it needs to be more balanced in selecting its project impact areas. This can happen only if it evolves from its existing setup as a mere collection of actions taken by its member states to a coordinated and institutionalised effort, where the business transactions do not rest on existing bilateral and multilateral ties or policies.
The present form of institutionalisation, where governmental agencies have incorporated the processes related to QUAD’s functioning, is not future-proof. It remains heavily dependent on the focus of the member state governments. The question of its survivability has surfaced whenever there has been a change in the political leadership of the member states, and this will continue to be the case despite assurances from US President Joe Biden in the recently held fourth leaders’ summit in Wilmington, Delaware. A formally institutionalised QUAD will ensure that such apprehensions are substantially put to rest, helping QUAD garner greater trust from the countries in the Indo-Pacific.
The solution thus lies in overcoming these inhibitions and fast-tracking the process of institutionalising the QUAD based on identified common areas of cooperation and interest while keeping the ambit of hard security out of it.
It is quite evident that the present semi-institutional setup acts as a drag in the growth trajectory of QUAD and adversely impacts its image as a transparent and reliable player capable of out-matching the pace of initiatives by China. The Institutionalisation of QUAD is likely to give it much-needed impetus and focus, enhancing its credibility amongst nations of the Indo-Pacific Region. However, challenges in the complete institutionalisation of QUAD remain far too many, the most critical being its members’ averseness to being seen and branded as a security alliance working against China due to their deep individual economic and security imbroglios with it. The solution thus lies in overcoming these inhibitions and fast-tracking the process of institutionalising the QUAD based on identified common areas of cooperation and interest while keeping the ambit of hard security out of it. This would also provide the much-needed time to identify areas of convergence and cooperation amongst member states and assist in assessing the Chinese behaviour to further develop the strategy to either shift to a security-based alliance or remain otherwise.
Puneet Sharma is a serving Indian Army Officer.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
Colonel Puneet Sharma, is a serving Indian Army Officer. He was commissioned into the Army (The Grenadiers Regiment) in year 2000. He has vast experience ...
Read More +
PREV
