India’s mobile-first online gaming boom is increasingly shaped by dark patterns, and policy must move beyond a gambling-only lens towards design guardrails, digital hygiene, and accessible mental health support
Image Source: Getty Images
Daily login rewards are routine in various mobile hits such as BGMI and Free Fire. Log in each day, collect a bonus, keep the streak — and a missed day can reset progress. In a predominantly mobile-first market, this is the pocket panopticon: a phone that nudges behaviour through notifications and timed rewards. The term panopticon comes from Jeremy Bentham’s 18th-century prison design, later developed by Michel Foucault to describe systems in which behaviour is shaped not through force, but through continuous cues, surveillance, and self-regulation. In the mobile era, the watchtower may now be in the pocket, with notifications, timed rewards, and loss-framed incentives imperceptibly structuring routines.
The Economic Survey 2025-26 notes that internet connections rose from 25.15 crore in 2014 to 101.8 crore by September 2025, and that 89.1 percent of households now own at least one smartphone. Among 15- to 29-year-olds, mobile and internet use are close to universal. Online gaming sits within an always-on bundle, delivered through application (app) stores and push alerts, made frictionless by Unified Payments Interface (UPI)-enabled one-tap payments. The Survey puts gaming revenues at around INR 232 billion in 2024, with growth driven largely by mobile platforms and digital payments. Industry estimates put India’s gamer base at around 568 million in FY23, underscoring how wide the exposure is.
In online gaming, these ‘dark patterns’ include daily rewards and streaks, pay-to-skip timers, premium currencies that obscure real prices, limited-time scarcity, reward ads, and guild obligations. While recent regulatory action has focused largely on real-money gaming and financial risk, the Survey is explicit that digital harm extends well beyond gambling.
The deaths by suicide of three sisters in Ghaziabad in February 2026, now under investigation amid reporting that has repeatedly invoked online gaming habits alongside broader distress, have heightened public anxiety. The debate on online gaming should not, however, default to the often-advocated approach of blanket bans or moral panic. Instead, it should focus on ‘dark patterns’ — which India’s consumer regulator defines as deceptive designs that impair autonomy and trick users into unintended choices — and on how these mechanics can magnify vulnerability and harm.
In online gaming, these ‘dark patterns’ include daily rewards and streaks, pay-to-skip timers, premium currencies that obscure real prices, limited-time scarcity, reward ads, and guild obligations. While recent regulatory action has focused largely on real-money gaming and financial risk, the Survey is explicit that digital harm extends well beyond gambling. It calls for broader public health responses, including school-based digital literacy, parental guidance, Tele-MANAS, specialised clinics such as NIMHANS’s SHUT programme, and healthier defaults across digital platforms.
The debate in India about gaming harm often narrows to real-money gaming and gambling, captured in the most dramatic headlines. That focus is understandable. It is also incomplete, because it leaves out a more everyday design problem. Many of the techniques that fuel compulsive play and impulsive spending sit inside ordinary free-to-play mobile games as well, not just in fringe betting apps. The real question is whether certain interface and reward choices are steering users towards behaviours they did not set out to adopt. Not every feature presented below in Table 1 is inherently a dark pattern, but each can become one when it relies on opacity, coercion, or manufactured friction, and together they show how online games can make disengagement harder.
Table 1: Engagement and Monetisation Mechanics that may become Dark Patterns
| Theme | What It Looks Like | What The Mechanic Does |
| Time and Attention | Daily login rewards; streak mechanics; energy systems or time gates; rewarded advertisements | Encourages return visits; penalises breaks through resets and loss-framed progress; introduces waiting and then sells relief by nudging users into loops, making attention feel like currency. |
| While none of these mechanics is inherently unethical, their accumulation can reduce user autonomy and increase time spent in ways associated with behavioural health risks. | ||
| Monetisation Patterns | Premium in-game currencies; random item drops; chance-based crafting | Obscures real-world prices; limited-time offers create artificial urgency; and pay-to-win design creates spending pressure. |
| ‘Gacha’ and Loot-Box-Like Design | Paid “pulls” for desirable characters or items | Resembles loot-boxes. Although often not legally classified as gambling, these systems function in gambling-like ways because payment buys a chance rather than a predictable product. |
| Spending | ‘Whales’ | A small minority of high spenders can account for a large share of revenue, sharing characteristics associated with problematic gaming, and raising questions about business models that rely on escalation among vulnerable users. |
| Large survey studies link loot-box spending with problem gambling severity; a review links microtransaction engagement with gaming disorder and gambling disorder, with loot-boxes appearing to pose a higher addiction risk than other microtransactions. | ||
| Social Design Patterns | Guilds; clans; team events | Can foster genuine community, but may transform social bonds into obligation through scheduled raids. |
| Social Acquisition Patterns | Referral ladders; invite rewards | Converts players into acquisition channels. |
| Social Psychology | Metaperception concerns | Evidence suggests givers worry about how the incentive makes them look to receivers, shaping what they share and how they share it; described as soft coercion leaning on social ties and status, potent for adolescents and young adults. |
| Lock-In | Sunk-cost effects; progress framing | Long progression arcs, collectable sets, and near-complete bars can keep users chasing closure. |
| Casino-Adjacent Presentation | Randomised reward presentation in Gacha systems | Near misses, animated reveals, and rotating banners heighten the urge to try just once more. |
Source: Compiled by the Author from multiple references > Whales, FOMO, Referral Rewards, Microtransactions, Gacha, Loot-Boxes, MMORPGs, Dark Patterns
The United Kingdom (UK) Government’s evidence process on loot-boxes captures the policy tension, with debate over whether they meet legal tests for gambling, even as concerns about harm and consumer protection remain. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission’s action against Epic Games over Fortnite points also highlights how regulators are beginning to treat manipulative interface design and unwanted in-game charges as consumer protection issues rather than merely parenting problems.
In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission’s action against Epic Games over Fortnite points also highlights how regulators are beginning to treat manipulative interface design and unwanted in-game charges as consumer protection issues rather than merely parenting problems.
These design levers are not unique to games. The same family of tactics can be seen in infinite-scroll social media feeds, autoplay features, and streak-driven engagement loops. Naming them matters because it gives regulators something concrete to act on. India can then move beyond a pendulum swing between bans and laissez-faire approaches, and towards targeted guardrails that protect autonomy and mental well-being without treating play itself as the enemy.
India’s online gaming debate has been pulled between two instincts. One is prohibition, usually triggered by a crisis headline. The other is complacency, justified by the idea that gaming is ‘just entertainment’. Both miss what the Economic Survey is trying to reframe: that India has largely solved for access and now needs to solve for behavioural health and digital hygiene. The right policy response is therefore neither blanket bans nor a narrow fixation on real-money games. It is a public health and consumer protection agenda that makes manipulation harder.
India should explicitly treat dark patterns in games as a consumer protection issue. This would shift the target from “gaming” as a culture to specific mechanics that degrade autonomy.
India’s recent regulatory action has centred on monetary harm and wagering-style formats. However, the compulsion mechanics that drive sleep loss and distress also sit within mainstream free-to-play games. The next step should be a gaming-specific guidance note that applies to all online games distributed in India, not only money games, setting minimum standards on dark patterns that are unacceptable for minors and high-risk for all users.
China’s approach shows that states can push platforms to change mechanics within their jurisdiction, but its hard time caps for minors rely on intrusive enforcement. India should not import that playbook. What is useful is the principle of focusing on inducement and retention mechanics. China’s regulatory direction has signalled constraints on incentives such as daily login rewards and repeated recharge inducements. India can implement similar design guardrails through consumer protection rules and app store compliance without building a surveillance-heavy architecture.
Randomised monetisation should not be allowed to hide behind premium currencies and ambiguous odds. India should require probability disclosures for gacha- or loot-box-style systems, clear rupee equivalents, spend dashboards, and cooling-off friction for repeated late-night purchases.
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020’s emphasis on holistic development and wellbeing provides a legitimate policy home for a practical curriculum on persuasive design and habit loops, rather than moralising. Schools can use simple, standard prompts and short modules modelled on public health communication to explain streak mechanics, FOMO (fear of missing out) events, gacha odds, and autoplay features, as well as why sleep and attention are foundational health inputs.
When gaming becomes harmful, the response pathway should resemble any other behavioural health intervention, comprising early identification, counselling, and accessible support. The World Health Organisation’s ICD-11 classification frames ‘gaming disorder’ around impaired control, prioritisation, and continuation despite negative consequences, with functional impairment as the diagnostic threshold. India should scale and normalise services already cited by the Survey, including Tele-MANAS, and connect them to schools and primary care referral systems.
Schools can use simple, standard prompts and short modules modelled on public health communication to explain streak mechanics, FOMO (fear of missing out) events, gacha odds, and autoplay features, as well as why sleep and attention are foundational health inputs.
India is too large, well-connected, and too digitally adept for bans to be the default response. A rights-respecting policy package should instead make online gaming easier to exit, harder to overspend on, and safer to use, while ensuring that when play tips into distress, help is accessible. That would be the difference between regulating a product category and building a public health response for the pocket panopticon.
K. S. Uplabdh Gopal is an Associate Fellow with the Health Initiative at the Observer Research Foundation.
The views expressed above belong to the author(s). ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.
Dr. K. S. Uplabdh Gopal is an Associate Fellow with the Health Initiative at the Observer Research Foundation. He writes and researches on how India’s ...
Read More +
PREV
