Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taliban, War Fatigue, Narrative, US Pullout

Security personnel of Pakistan's Frontier Corps stand on an armoured vehicle neara border crossing point between Pakistan and Afghanistan


Pakistan’s predicament in Afghanistan is best summed up by Oscar Wilde’s famous aphorism: “In this world, there are only two tragedies. One is not getting what one wants, the other is getting it. The last is much the worst, the last is the real tragedy”. For the last 20 years, Pakistan has done everything possible to get the Taliban back in the driving seat in Kabul. Now, when Pakistan is about to achieve what it has always wanted, there are doubts being expressed on whether an outright Taliban victory might not end up being a disaster, or a real tragedy, not just for Afghanistan but also for Pakistan and, perhaps, the rest of the region; even the rest of the world. Of course, the Pakistanis deny that they want the Taliban monopolising power in Afghanistan. But are their denials credible? After all, for the last 20 years, the Pakistanis have also denied that they were supporting, sponsoring, giving sanctuary to the Taliban, even supervising and participating in their operations. Why should anyone, therefore, take their latest denials seriously, especially since they fly in the face of logic?

Ever since the US-led military operations in Afghanistan after 9/11, and especially after the Taliban resurgence around 2004-05, both Islamabad and Rawalpindi have rather disingenuously advocated that there is no military solution to Afghanistan. And yet, throughout this time, the Pakistani ‘Deep State’ has worked assiduously towards imposing a military solution through the Taliban. It isn’t as if the Americans or their Western allies were unaware of the Pakistani double-games and double-speak. But for some inexplicable reason, all that the strongest military and economic force in the history of humankind was able to do was plead with the Pakistanis to ‘do more’. Some half-hearted, half-baked, half-measures were undertaken to force the Pakistanis to stop their support for the Taliban. But even these were never really followed through.

Ever since the US-led military operations in Afghanistan after 9/11, and especially after the Taliban resurgence around 2004-05, both Islamabad and Rawalpindi have rather disingenuously advocated that there is no military solution to Afghanistan

Clearly, the Pakistanis seemed to have had a much better measure of the Americans than the Americans had of themselves. They were also able to play the Americans much better than the other way round. The result is before us. The Americans have been defeated—no amount of spin or window-dressing can hide this reality—and are withdrawing. And, once again, the Pakistanis are trying to play them, this time to get whatever they can before the Americans quit. The old adage in Afghanistan—if you have come, what have you brought with you? If you are leaving, what are you leaving behind?—is once again coming into play; only this time it is Pakistan which will seek to maximise its benefit by both playing victim and at the same time seeking to strike bargains—economic, military and political—with the US.

Unworkable Solutions

Look at it from Pakistan’s point of view and it is clear that a military solution in favour of the Taliban is the best outcome, for now at least. Everything else is either a pie in the sky, or else unpalatable and therefore unacceptable, not just to the Pakistanis but also to the Taliban and the Afghan government.

The search for a negotiated political solution in Afghanistan is really nothing more than a pipedream. For the Taliban and Pakistan, talk of the ‘political solution’ is just a way to keep stringing along the Americans and the Afghan government—in Pakistani parlance, making them chase the tail-lights of a truck. The chances of any political solution were always infinitesimally small because the chasm between the ‘Islamic Republic’ and ‘Islamic Emirate’ is simply unbridgeable. This is also why no ‘power sharing agreement’ will ever work. Why would the Taliban agree to share power when they can grab it all? All the talk of Taliban suffering war fatigue is only self-serving nonsense with absolutely no evidence to back it. Even if in the unlikely event that, at this late stage, the Taliban agree to share power, they will only want to do it on their terms, under their control, and under the rubric of the Emirate not the Republic. In other words, the Taliban will show their ‘magnanimity’ by throwing some crumbs at their adversaries but only if they get to call all the shots, something the Afghan government is unlikely to accept, not without a fight anyway.

The idea of an interim government is also unworkable. It was tried in 1992 when a road map was also signed on by all protagonists. The solemn assurances that were given, including in Mecca, were observed more in their violation. That interim government had a prime minister, Gulbadin Hekmatyar, who couldn’t ever enter Kabul and who then bombed Kabul into rubble with the support of his Pakistani patrons. Another such interim government will suffer a similar fate. In fact, chances are that even if the Taliban accept such a government, they will use it only to get their proverbial nose in the tent before they take over the entire tent.

If the political solution and interim government is a pipedream, the talk of a regional solution involving Iran, China, Pakistan, Russia, Central Asian states, and India, is not just completely unrealistic, but also a recipe for disaster. Such a regional approach has been tried multiple times since the 1990s. It didn’t work then, it won’t work now. Each of the regional players have their own interests, which are not just in conflict with the interests of one or more of the other regional players, but also not necessarily in conformity with the interests of Afghanistan and Afghan people.

If the political solution and interim government is a pipedream, the talk of a regional solution involving Iran, China, Pakistan, Russia, Central Asian states, and India, is not just completely unrealistic, but also a recipe for disaster

The Military Solution

With political and diplomatic solutions being unworkable or unfeasible, it is clear that the civil war that has been underway for over a decade now will be fought with more ferocity. Unless the Afghan government folds up within weeks of a complete US withdrawal, the civil war will stretch for months, maybe even years. A prolonged civil war is clearly not in Pakistan’s interest. Pakistan’s grand plans of connectivity and becoming the hub of Central Asian trade and transit, making the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor a viable project that starts paying for itself, and generally gaining both politically and strategically from a friendly and peaceful Afghanistan, will come a cropper. Worse, a long and bloody civil war will spill over into Pakistan, what with refugees streaming in and the blowback of Afghanistan’s instability impacting Pakistan’s security.

Pakistan’s grand plans of connectivity and becoming the hub of Central Asian trade and transit, making the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor a viable project that starts paying for itself, and generally gaining both politically and strategically from a friendly and peaceful Afghanistan, will come a cropper.

There are only two ways Pakistan can try and prevent this. First, Pakistan can lean real hard on the Taliban to reconcile—agree to a power sharing arrangement (which as we said earlier is easier said than done) under an interim government (again an unworkable proposition even if it became possible) and then develop a consensus on the constitutional structure and political character of the Afghan state. Apart from the fact that Pakistan hasn’t managed to achieve all this in its own country, expecting it to achieve this in Afghanistan is simply delusional. Even otherwise, Pakistan would be chary of doing this because it wouldn’t want to push the Taliban and other assorted Islamists too hard, lest they turn against Pakistan. After all, their dependence on Pakistan has reduced considerably in the last year or two, and will reduce even more after the US withdraws. If Rawalpindi tries to play hard-ball, the Taliban will push back. It has its own leverages—Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and its affiliates and perhaps also other ethnic insurgent groups—that will be unleashed against Pakistan.

The other option before Pakistan is to double-down in its military support to the Taliban. This is exactly what Pakistan did in the 1990s and is likely to repeat in the 2020s. In fact, this time around, the Pakistani assistance to Taliban war effort will be even greater than what it was in the past because Pakistan would want the opposition to Taliban swept aside as soon as possible. As said earlier, Pakistan simply cannot afford a prolonged civil war in Afghanistan. Of course, if the Afghan National Security Forces fold up, then Pakistan can pretend its hands are clean.

A Self-serving Narrative

All the doomsday scenarios and dire warnings being aired in Pakistan about the horrors that will befall it if Taliban win or Afghanistan descends into chaos actually help the Pakistan’s ruling military establishment to create a narrative of how they are in the eye of the storm and need greater international assistance. That Pakistanis have actually stirred up the approaching storm and didn’t lift a little finger to stop the Taliban resurgence is, needless to say, conveniently glossed over. In any case, none of these warnings will have any impact on the policy of the military establishment, which thinks that it has the future all worked out.

The way the Pakistanis see it, apart from the strategic, political and economic benefits that a Taliban-ruled Afghanistan will bring, Pakistan will also be better placed to crush the restiveness in the Pashtun areas that is being spearheaded by the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement. Diplomatically, the Pakistani military establishment’s calculation will be that as long as there is no terrorist attack in the West that can be traced back to Afghanistan, the West will turn a blind eye to what happens inside Afghanistan. In any case, after their ignominious exit from Afghanistan, neither the US nor its other allies are going to come back to Afghanistan in a hurry. The over-the-horizon operations being planned are so much hot air. After all, what will they achieve that over a 100,000 US troops on ground couldn’t? At most, the US will pressure Pakistan to ‘do more’. Perhaps, it will even lean on Pakistan to give some base or listening post. This will create a dilemma for Pakistan, but not one that will unduly worry the Pakistanis.

The way the Pakistanis see it, apart from the strategic, political and economic benefits that a Taliban-ruled Afghanistan will bring, Pakistan will also be better placed to crush the restiveness in the Pashtun areas that is being spearheaded by the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement

Bases and Benefits

Adept at playing both sides, the Pakistanis could give bases to the Americans but impose some serious constraints on them, in addition to taking top dollar from them, seeking weapons and, perhaps, some political and diplomatic support. In other words, they will try to not repeat the mistake of selling themselves cheap to the Americans. They will, at the same time, tell the Taliban to not react adversely to such an arrangement with the Americans. The sales pitch to the Taliban will be that just as for 20 years the Pakistanis gave the Americans all sorts of facilities but also helped the Taliban achieve victory, they will again ensure that no serious damage is done to the Taliban regime because of US presence in Pakistan.

All of this sounds great on paper. But Afghanistan has a bad habit of springing nasty surprises that upset the most carefully calculated and calibrated plans. Pakistan, in any case, has a terrible track record of miscalculating. In the 1990s, too, the Pakistanis thought they had everything worked out. Those plans went awry very fast. Will the 2020s be any different? In other words, will getting what it wanted in Afghanistan and what it worked for so hard—bring the Taliban back to power—end up in real tragedy for Pakistan?

The views expressed above belong to the author(s).

ORF research and analyses now available on Telegram! Click here to access our curated content — blogs, longforms and interviews.


Sushant Sareen


Covid-19: What US, China data tell us about children’s risk profile

Covid-19: Impact on Africa

Covid-19 pandemic-pandemonium: Need for a more holistic idea of disaster management

Nigeria must not forget its poor in the Covid-19 world

No, China isn’t winning the virus propaganda battle

Mauritius: Old and new challenges in a post-pandemic world

A global comparison of COVID-19 deaths: How is India doing in counting its sick and dead?

How China overcame the Covid-19 pandemic

Amid Covid-19 crisis, its politics as usual in Slovenia

Redefining the development narrative during Covid-19: The private sector perspective

A global pandemic and globalisation

Technology and business order post COVID-19

France facing Covid-19: growing pressure on the public health system

COVID19: What we’ve learnt from New York’s deadliest week

The circuit breaker: Singapore’s next move in its fight against COVID-19

American bioweapon or the ‘China Virus’? The war of words over COVID-19

Coexisting with #Covid19: Saving lives and the economy

The wrong diagnosis

Covid-19: China’s donation diplomacy towards Africa turns into a public relations disaster

COVID19: The Chinese military is busy exploiting the pandemic

Mitigating risks and adjusting to isolation: How Argentina is dealing With Covid19

Covid-19: The perfect storm for deep reform

#Covid19: For now, lives over livelihoods

How a changing global order will emerge in the post-Covid world

The Caribbean region must come together to fight Covid19

Politics of pandemic: Public health can no longer wait

Georgia goes all out in fight against Covid19

COVID19: A boost for Indian labour in the global market

Armed Forces and the Covid19 pandemic

Bhutan’s preparedness and response to COVID19

Economic recovery and recurring lockdown in China after Covid19 crisis

Public transit in post COVID19 India: where do we go from here

Critiquing Amartya Sen’s contention of post-lockdown society

Post pandemic city planning

Could third world countries seek a new world order in Covid19 aftermath?

Economic vulnerabilities and power shifts in a post-Covid19 world

Opportunity in Crisis: Will a pandemic lead to peace with the Taliban in Afghanistan? 

Health Policy belongs to the national security domain and different stakeholders must engage

Can the global economy survive COVID19 shocks?

The COVID19 reality of Afghanistan

Changing the script

Leadership in the time of Corona

PM’s India shutdown is an unprecedented gamble

COVID19: Tamil Nadu’s demand for fiscal grant can put centre in a fix

COVID19 brings Australia to the crossroads

The battle to set oil prices

Luxembourg faces the same dilemma as the EU: become a bridge or a fortress

Peace during a pandemic: The US fumbles on in Afghanistan

Crisis communication and the Coronavirus contagion

COVID-19 and maritime operations

How PM Modi scored with COVIDiplomacy

Covid-19: The crisis will strengthen anti-globalisation voices

An old scourge in a new, uncertain age

To what extent will coronavirus outbreak rewire global trade dynamics?

The Chinese model is under stress

A sneeze, a global cold and testing times for China

Corona: The case for taking China to ICJ

Covid-19, India and crisis communication

How Is COVID-19 reshaping China-India relations?

France must confront the grim realities of its war against COVID 19

Covid19: G20 leaders reclaim power from bureaucrats – and China

The United Nations Security Council and securitization of COVID-19

Mexico can teach us COVID 19 management

Covid-19 and European solidarity: The fight for who we are

Dr WHO and Mr Hyde

Certified Corona-Immunity as a resource and a way back to normality

Coronavirus derails Glasgow

Food security and the Corona Virus

The Polish example: Defending the castle in the European East

COVID19: Americans brace for brutal week against grim backdrop of chaotic policymaking

SOS for the road transport sector at the time of CoVid19 pandemic

Despite Coronavirus outbreak, India-Israel friendship continue to shine

COVID-19 and international collaboration in a leaderless world

Covid-19: A report from Nigeria

As Dubai EXPO 2020 is postponed, a tough time for NRIs

The virtual space uptick during Covid-19

OECD, BRICS Countries must mitigate Covid-19 fallout through targeted measures

A new human being will emerge in the post-Covid-19 world

Ravaged by war, Cameroon’s Southwests region turns attention to Covid-19 fight

What India needs on 14 April

Covid-19 crisis and a probable role for the Indian Military

COVID-19 and the gameplay of West Asia’s geopolitics

Covid19 has sharpened great power politics

Liechtenstein’s national and international response to COVID19

Why China and Pakistan need each other in the Covid19 crisis

Diplomacy is another victim of the virus

Gated globalisation and fragmented supply chains

West Asia is staring at an economic crisis. India has to be prepared

Fishing in troubled waters during a pandemic

Xi’s moves seem to be backfiring

Iran’s grim fight against coronavirus

Why is the Covid 19 situation so grim in MP?

Hacking the pandemic : Lessons from the Silicon valley of India

Between firmness and hesitation: How Russia is responding to the COVID19 challenge

World after Covid19 pandemic

Israel must bring its diverse communities together in Covid19 fight

China tightens grip over the South China Sea – should India worry?

Nod, Nudge, (K)nock out: Ways for RBI to prompt banks to lend

Will Covid19 crisis hasten the end of PM Abe’s regime?

Covid19: China-Russia make strategic geopolitical moves in Italy

Leadership accountability for Covid19 and the reasons for WHO’s apathy

Maldives: Amidst worsening Covid19 crisis, ISIS ‘claims maiden attack’

The impact COVID19 pandemic is exerting on e-commerce

COVID19 and competition for influence in South Asia

Examining India’s employment landscape amidst the COVID19 disruptions

Will COVID19 crisis rejuvenate the coalition of SAARC nations

The future of international cooperation in times of existentialist crises

Rebooting Ramadan for COVID19 times: With tech but without Iftar parties

COVID19’s impact on India’s solar industry

Reset in EU-China relations tougher in a post Covid19 world

India fires a salvo at China

Bend it like Kerala: How an Indian state is holding its own against COVID19

Post covid stimulus for clean energy: Govt must focus on developing an EV ecosystem

Women leaders and alpha males up against Covid19

East Africa and Kenya under the COVID19 emergency

Can ‘Advance manufacturing’ change the game in India-Australia relationship

International trade and environment sustainability: The two must tango

Fiscal prudence still matters

Maldives: Evacuation, yet another-milestone in bilateral ties

2020 could be to Narendra Modi what 1991 was to P.V. Narasimha Rao: a lasting legacy

China’s salami slicing overdrive

Rolling up the welcome mat for Chinese investors

China’s assertive behavior in the South China Sea and the implications for India

Xi Jinping: A matter of state security

How growth and equity get a boost in Finance Minister’s economic stimulus package

Why is China building its nuclear arsenal as world fights COVID?

Keep Hobbes at bay whilst Covid is at play

Nepal: Challenges of reviving economy, post-Covid

The pandemic and China are strengthening US-India relations, for now

The trends shaping the post-COVID19 world

How the pandemic is an opportunity to create a ‘more equal’ world

COVID19 and the middle power moment in global politics

Coronavirus is straining the concept of federalism

Infections, Islamophobia, and intensifying societal polarization

Government is being cautious, and that’s sensible

Covid19 and implications on global health governance

Community model from rural Maharashtra to combat Covid19

Covid19: The birth of a new power

Biological Weapons and Biosecurity – Lessons from the COVID19 war

What can we learn from the genomes of the novel coronavirus?

What India’s digital divide means for migrant workers in a COVID19 world and beyond

COVID19 has hit Africa’s amateur athletes

Exiting the ‘COVID chakravyuh’ through a bioethics prism

Guiding democracy through Covid19: Poland shows us what not to do

Rethink, Revive, Rescue: From the Pandemic to Multilateralism 2.0

Return of the migrants

Covid19 is reshaping Brazil’s politics

Vietnam emerges victorious in fight against Covid19

How Georgia tackled Covid19 bit by bit

The potential fallouts of EU’s collective response to COVID19

Covid19 has forced us to think about building a remote working culture

How Bangladesh is addressing the Covid19 pandemic

Covid reality: Cost of human lives and how to fund healthcare

Walled city dilemmas in the fight against COVID19: The case of Ahmedabad

Viral load matters: Frontline healthcare workers 11% of US COVID19 cases

Sustained shift to virtual classrooms may not be a good idea for India

Cooperation of consequence: Lessons from the 2004 tsunami response in the era of COVID19

COVID, oil collapse and economic contraction: Can the low carbon transition be salvaged?

Antibody tests not useful for back-to-work policy decisions: Expert

Risks of putting all eggs in China basket

Mumbai in numbers

Every policy change does not a reform make

Reviving the Indian economy- revisiting Mr. Keynes

India needs to win back the third world’s trust

Epidemic in China and the world: Public health, earth science and geopolitics

COVID-19: China’s ‘Health Silk Road’ diplomacy in Iran and Turkey

China’s footprint is growing within the United Nations

Russian response to Covid-19: The challenges ahead

Inter-species spillover of viruses: Understanding zoonosis and India’s future concern

Nature, politics and Covid-19

The real journey of Hydroxychloroquine

The economic cost of COVID19 is bigger than the great depression

To die hungry or die sick

US-India cooperation against COVID19

Towards a quad-plus arrangement

Will the coming monsoons result in a spike in COVID19 cases in India?

Covid19 and Conflict in Myanmar: No Truce for the Rohingya

Perspectives on SARS-CoV-2 strains

COVID19 and the acceleration of digital transformations in maritime logistics

  • May 22 2020

How the Visegrád group countries have managed the Corona crisis

Lockdown: uncertain gains, rising losses

Covid Corrections: How the Pandemic Reveals the Failures of India’s Growth Model

COVID19: Public health is a question of national security

Understanding the coming challenges to India’s pharma sector

Lockdowns, curfews and prayer: Exploring East African countries’ COVID19 response

WHO, the battleground for cold war 2.0

Covid-19 and emerging economies: What to expect in the short- and medium-term

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Germany’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic