- Feb 10 2017
A staggering five women die every hour in India due to causes related to pregnancy and childbirth. And two-thirds of the around 45,000 such deaths annually occur outside any medical facility, that is, either at homes or en route to hospitals.
This is despite a slow improvement in the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in the country. As appropriate medical surveillance and intervention can almost entirely prevent maternal deaths, MMR is deemed a sensitive indicator of the general quality of a health system, according to the World Health Organisation.
Hence, this abysmal mortality rate reflects a general lack of physical and financial access to healthcare, which is a fact of life for many Indian households.
Yet, a bizarre and parallel narrative is unfolding across the country.
In contrast to such under-provisioning of maternal care, there is an emergent story of over-provisioning too, in rich and poor states alike. And nothing demonstrates this phenomenon better than the “Caesarean Epidemic.”
A caesarean section or a C-section is a delivery through a surgical incision in the mother’s abdomen and uterus, in situations where a vaginal delivery could put the baby or mother at medical risk. However, disturbingly, more pregnant women in India are going under the scalpel for deliveries than is normal.
The WHO made it unequivocally clear in a 2015 statement that C-section rates higher than 10% do not help reduce maternal and newborn mortality rates. But India crossed this threshold way back in 2005 when the figure hit 10.6%.
While national-level data is yet to be published, here’s a look at the numbers from five states: Uttar Pradesh (UP), Goa, Punjab, Uttarakhand, and Manipur.
While representing the country’s socio-economic diversity, and holding a mirror to the national situation, these states are also important because they are now at various stages of holding elections to their legislative assemblies. In each of these, the numbers pose a public health threat.
Notably, the increase in the rate of C-sections over the last decade seems to be largely driven by the private sector in these states.
As we await the latest data from UP, it is safe to say that among the five states, at least one in three deliveries in private hospitals are by C-section. And analysis of NFHS 2015-16 data shows that in states like Goa and Manipur, it is one in two deliveries.
Meanwhile, even a poor state like UP has districts like Banda (58.7%), Basti (38.1%), Gorakhpur (39.5%), Pilibhit (40.8%) and Sonbhadra (39.7%) with very high proportions of C-sections in private hospitals, as data from the Annual Health Survey 2012-13 suggests.
In many of Punjab’s districts, the share is more than half.
A bizarre fad
The main reasons cited for undergoing C-sections are: to avoid the excruciating pain of normal childbirth, doctor’s convenience, profiteering, and cultural issues like the “mahurat baby” fad. However, reducing a C-section to a minor procedure resorted to for convenience’s sake trivialises the risks involved.
As the WHO points out, like any major surgery, “Caesarean sections are associated with short and long term risk which can extend many years beyond the current delivery and affect the health of the woman, her child, and future pregnancies.”
In 2013, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a statement against what is known as “maternal-request caesareans” or C-sections done at the request of the mother without a medical condition. It said that women undergoing C-sections face the risk of infection as well as bladder and bowel injuries during surgery, along with serious complications like placental problems, uterine rupture, and emergency hysterectomy.
If nothing, India has another major reason to immediately deal with the epidemic. Babies born vaginally have fewer respiratory problems. A 2014 study showed that C-section babies have a considerably increased risk for asthma.
Given the alarming rates of pollution across our country, especially its cities, and the already high burden of respiratory infections, Indian parents seeking a convenient C-section may be unwittingly gifting their child a chronic disease.
Systematic studies to establish the connection between the burden of asthma in children and C-section will be a first step towards the long-term management of this public health problem, particularly in regions that are the hot spots.
It is heartening that many influential doctors have themselves begun advocating against medically unnecessary C-sections. A recent online petition demanding the union health ministry to mandate hospitals to publicly declare the share of C-section deliveries indicates a growing public awareness.
Will it turn into concrete action? Only time will tell.
This commentary originally appeared in Quartz India.
Comments are closed.