Why is Jairam Ramesh
singing a different tune?
M K Venu
29, October 2009
Environment
Minister Jairam Ramesh’s recent utterances
suggesting India should have a more constructive
engagement with the developed economies on climate
change issues has caused both confusion and
consternation among India’s policy wonks. Confusion
occurred because he challenged the perceived wisdom
that India must not yield any ground to the
developed economies which are clearly responsible
for over 70 per cent of the existing stock of
greenhouse gas emissions globally. There was
consternation because India needs its own carbon
space in the future to meet the basic material needs
of some 800 million people who are at the lowest end
of the consumption cycle. For instance, the per
capita energy consumption of 800 million Indians,
equal to the combined population of the US and EU,
would probably be less than 150 units a year,
compared with 8,000 to 10,000 units per person in
the West. So the conventional Indian reflex is to
not yield an inch to the West on this score.
However, the apparent confusion caused by Ramesh has
another serious dimension which cannot be ignored.
There is a growing self-perception, especially among
the urban middle classes, that India is now a rising
global economy and must therefore behave like one.
It must act responsibly and contribute to the global
efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. So the
environment minister was probably reflecting this
thought process emanating from a new, even if
somewhat nascent, self-image of India. This
self-image gets further reinforced when India
becomes part of newly empowered groupings like the
G-20, which is called upon to explore new frameworks
to deal with issues like an alternate global
financial architecture or climate change. After all,
there has to be some shift in India’s position from
the 1970s when Indira Gandhi repeated ad nauseam at
various global forums that, “poverty is the greatest
polluter”.
But poverty still remains a big polluter, though not
on the scale it used to be. Consequently, it is a
sort of split personality that India projects at
crucial negotiations that deal with issues like
climate change. So Jairam Ramesh was merely
articulating the inner tensions of an “emerging
economic power with considerable poverty”.
Mind you, China has the same problem at these
negotiations. It has officially projected that it
would be a fully-developed economy by 2030. Yet,
like India, in negotiations relating to climate
change or the WTO, it projects a split personality.
Some years ago both India and China stoutly resisted
an attempt in the WTO to officially describe them as
“advanced developing economies”, so that the
benefits going to the least developed nations could
not be denied to them. This again results from the
same paradox. Becoming rich, yet remaining so poor!
This is precisely what India is having to deal with
in the run-up to the climate change negotiations at
Copenhagen in December. Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh wants to cooperate with the US and EU, and
does not want to be seen as a deal-breaker. Yet,
political pressure is building up back home that
India must not compromise an inch the future carbon
space of 800 million poor Indians with a per capital
income of less than a dollar a day.
The attempt at Copenhagen is to evolve a larger
framework for standardised emission cuts by both the
developed and developing nations so that the
concentration of greenhouse gases is kept well under
control. Currently the CO2 concentration in the
atmosphere is about 385 parts per million. It is
estimated that global temperatures could rise by 2
degrees Celsius if the CO2 concentration goes above
400 parts per million. This could play far greater
havoc with the developing nations with bigger
populations.
But the key question is how to undertake cuts in a
manner that the developed world pays for the
adjustment costs as per the “polluter pays”
principle. India’s position has been articulated by
the prime minister who has said our per capita
emissions will not exceed that of the average of the
developed nations. This has come to be called “the
Manmohan convergence principle”. This principle is
expected to give India enough carbon space to
accommodate its development imperatives.
India’s per capital carbon emission today stands at
close to 1.5 tonnes a year. The average per capita
emissions of the developed world is around 10
tonnes. The convergence principle suggests that
India’s per capita emissions could move up from 1.5
tonnes and converge with the gradually reducing per
capita emission of the rich nations at some point.
Of course this principle is not acceptable yet to
the US and EU, who are loathe to even look at per
capita emission as a basis of providing future
carbon space to emerging economies like India and
China. The US and EU want nations to agree to
absolute emission reduction targets.
A recent empirical study by experts (in the Economic
and Political Weekly of October 10) shows that if
emission cuts suggested by America’s proposed
Waxman-Markey bill were followed, then the emerging
economies’ per capita emission would converge with
that of the developed world by 2025 at about 6
tonnes of CO2. This means emerging economies like
India will probably lose further carbon space beyond
2025.
So, even the Manmohan convergence principle appears
to be a generous offer, as per this study which says
the most optimistic scenario of emission cuts
proposed by the West would ensure that the OECD
nations would still account for 50 per cent of
greenhouse gas stocks by the end of this century!
This clearly shows that the developed nations do not
want to compromise their own consumption patterns
over a longer time period in the hope that emerging
economies will play a bigger role in keeping further
global warming under check. To say that there is an
element of hypocrisy in their position would be a
gross understatement. This hypocrisy is further
reinforced in the latest data provided by the UNFCC
which shows most developed economies have increased
carbon emissions in the past ten years.
Among the signatories of the Kyoto protocol only
France, Germany and UK have achieved carbon
emissions at below their 1990 levels. This too has
been met partly by using the carbon offset mechanism
in which increased emissions are traded with the
developing world. The way things are going so far,
Copenhagen does not inspire much confidence.
Courtesy: Indian Express, October 28, 2009
Also See:
PRE CONFERENCE ROUNDTABLE | PARTICIPANTS
|